...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Natufians were cold-adapted
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kalonji: [QB] [QUOTE] Originally posted by Mindovermatter: Actually, its in total alignment with the position posited by mainstream academia. [b]Which is that Mushabian (African) and Kebaran (s.w. Asian) cultures both pre-date the Natufians culture,[/b] and that the combination of both cultures resulted in the rise of the Natufian.[/QUOTE]Then the following should be easy for you. What is the regional cultural urheimhat and what specific evidence is found at that site, in the earliest Natufian layer that substantiates an African co creation of the Natufians? I have asked you this before, but no answers, just like all the other things that you dropped, after realizing you had no point to begin with. Again, don’t give me Bar Yosefs conclusions, I want the [b]exact[/b] material evidence that substantiates an African co-creation of Mesolithic 2 from Mesolithic 1. [QUOTE] Originally posted by Mindovermatter: No kid, the point is/was [b]that you argue against the African contribution[/b] to the Natufian, supposedly because the Africans werent there and were latecomers. [/QUOTE]Huh, so now I argue against African contribution right..? Get your eyes checked bub. [QUOTE] Originally posted by Mindovermatter: When in actuality they were already present and played a definite role in the establishment of the Natfuian culture which arose out of the combination of Mushabians and Kebarans in the area prior to the Natufian[/QUOTE]Do you know the difference between ‘’a definite role’’ and having ‘’co-created’’ something? You’re starting to sound like hammer, who likes to repeat the same words robotically too. Show me: What is the regional cultural urheimhat and what specific evidence is found at that site, in the earliest Natufian layer that substantiates an African co creation of the Natufians? [QUOTE] Originally posted by Mindovermatter: Really? Hmm, my evidence shows that Africans (Mushabians) were in the Levant prior to the rise of Natufians[/QUOTE]Exactly, so what’s the problem? LOL, it only makes sense that their entrance into the Levant predates ‘’Natufian’’, whether you believe they were co-creators or whether they came later. They had to travel from Africa through the Sinai Peninsula and Southern Israel. They can’t just pop into the late Natufian archeological record, you turd. [QUOTE] Originally posted by Mindovermatter: (which right away debunks your premise that Africans were latecomers to the Levant) [/QUOTE]Where did I say they were latecomers to the [b]Levant[/b]? You made the accusation, now I want the [b]exact[/b] quote. [QUOTE] Originally posted by Mindovermatter: Well how about the basic point that Africans were not latecomers into the Natufian population, and were present prior to..? [/QUOTE]What is the regional cultural urheimhat and what specific evidence is found at that site, in the earliest Natufian layer that substantiates an African co creation of the Natufians? [QUOTE] Originally posted by Mindovermatter: [b]They (Africans) were already present in the Levant[/b] with numerous disperals begininng in the Mesolithic? [/QUOTE]Where is the bolded part denied by me? Stop yapping and start showing bub. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3