...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
1- Basic database of Nile Valley studies
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by alTakruri: [QB] I found out that Ehret has always meant that Mushabaeans carried proto-BoreAfrasian from Egypt across the Sinai and into the Levant where they met and mingled with the Keburan to birth the Natufians. Then, over millenia, pre-proto-Semitic developed in Israel-Palestine. Whatever pre-proto-Semitic may have consequently flourished throughout the region only one branch became the proto-Semitic from which descend all known Semitic languages spoken today. He has reverted to Afrasian because people have problems saying Afrasan and too many linguists are unsure of what family Afrasan refers to. So I retract my incorrect opinion that Ehret ever made claim to Semitic originating in Africa and that he switched from Afrasian to Afrasan then back to Afrasian due to about faces in theories. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3