...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Manilius Quote, 1st century AD (Roman)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by dana marniche: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by melchior7: [qb] [b]Any Eurasian influence is minute and insignifigant until late Dynastic times, and led to the eventual fall or Egypt.[/b] Yeah cause the Hyksos weren't Eurasians. Who said anything about the Egyptians being "all black"?? Well what the fcuk then??? [b]Don't pull that pathetic strawman BS argument with me . What I find funny is how when it comes to Egypt, Ethiopia, Nubia etc. suddenly the minority of Non Africans and Non Blacks become an important factor but when it comes to Greece, Numidians, Carthage, Arabs and Berbers suddenly you see no problem as claiming them as "Eurasian" "Caucasian" White or Middle.[/b] Thats cuz most of the Berbers weren't Blacks and the Greeks certainly weren't. Elementary my dear Watson..elementary. [b]I can care less about those types because they represent a Minority.[/b] Sez you. Used to be when you looked a book on Egyptology you would see many depictins of light skinned folks but if now if you look at Afrocentric Websites they show the Blackest Egyptians they can find. Are you going to deny you all don't have an agenda? [b]As I said earlier your only purpose is to Eurasainize any African Culture you can. Any African person without Blubbery Lips and Nappy Pepper Corn hair is suddenly Mixed, Middle Eastern Looking, or Eurasian.[/b] This is true. The earliest Africans, Khoisans and Pygmies were prefectly adaptated to their environment. Lighter skin, straight noses etc are likely the result of Back migrations of people who came from a different environment. I mean why were the Egyptians lighter than the Sudanese with finer hair and features?? Cuz they were mixed. [b] Then in the same breath you have a fit when Afrocentrics claim Blubbery lipped and curly haired Olmec, Greeks, Romans etc as being black[/b] Aside from the appearance of the Olmec statues what evidece do you have that they were Africans, Genetic? Historical? material culture?? The Greeks..well I am open minded to the ideas that some of orginal pelasgians or Helots may have had African or dravidian characteristics. But the Achaeans and Dorians they were Indo- Europeans who came from the North and brought Greek language and culture to the islands. And I don't know of any Black native Romans. [/qb][/QUOTE]Egyptians and many populations south of Egypt were an are the exact same color. And most Berber clans today are of course the same color they were when mentioned in early texts. Most of the major tribes of people that were known as Berbers are still dark brown and black and color. Those tribes as listed over and over again by the early Arab writers were the Zanata, Masmuda (from whom came the original Ghomara), Kitama, Hawara, Sanhaja. Any group of people that speaks Berber or Arab today is called Berber or Arab. These are names for nationalities and not ethnicities. No tribe of fair-skinned people whether Scythian, Vandal, people of the sea, Turk, Iranian, Syrian, Albanian, Armenian, or slave-descended was ever named Maurus or Berber in North Africa by the early Near Eastern or Byzantine writers. There were different populations of the Canary Islands and so called Gaunches according to both tradition and anthropology including the dark brown ones related to Phoenicians and Berbers as well as ones European affiliation. And of course Olmec's showed clearly both African type and Native American type skeletons as is oft mentioned in early anthropological studies. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3