...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Egyptian fakes, frauds, and deceptions
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by alTakruri: [qb] The paint has not faded off but was intentionally washed off by the restorers who say it was dirty.[/qb][/QUOTE]Since when does fading necessarily mean a natural process and not by intentional and artificial means?? I never suggested the latter to not be the case, as I'm well aware of so-called "restoration" works. [QUOTE][qb]Thanks for this pre-restoration original. In the coming decades pre-restoration original AE art will become harder and harder to find. By next century only post-restoration doctored complexion artwork will be all that's available and the people citing them will not even know the paint job is not that of the AEs. Now is the time to buy art books on AE published before 1963 and scan their pictures so to build a database of images as the AEs actually painted them not as Hawass and his teams of European and Egyptian painters with not a single black person among them are "restoring" them. [/qb][/QUOTE]Indeed. We've discussed this issue many times before, especially Doug. I myself have pointed out that older black-and-white photos show a lot more 'black' if you know what I mean than color photos of the same paintings today. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3