...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Bogus Wikipedia moles exposed and debunked
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [QB] They think they have control, but the joke is on the Wiki moles ultimately. As Asteb notes, data from ES keeps appearing near the very top of Google search results. This means people have a good, valid, early alternative to the Wiki distortions that contradicts them directly. Their attempts at spinning the issues thus is a failure, no matter how much they guard-dog the distorted articles. Furthermore ES stuff is credible because of its careful citations. This research is verifiable and it means that new editors will continually try to change the distorted articles, creating even more work for the moles and their admin collaborators. They have to scurry back and forth like rats deleting legit edits and sandbagging new editors. Their workload will never get any lighter at all. One can imagine the dweebs, pathetically checking their "guardpost" articles three of four times a day. They have to violate their own rules about "verifiable" content. MEanwhile they have weak articles with several errors, undermining their credibility. People will naturally gravitate towards more credible info posted in ES. Even more ironic, there is a lot of stuff they CAN'T put in WIki that we can put on ES and Reloaded. They are handicapped by their own rules while on ES we have total freedom, Take your pic posts on ancient Egyptians Djehuti. I see them now well represented on the web as a bloc. They cannot put some of these on Wiki due to copyright restrictions. While they scurry back and forth- deluding themselves that they are "guarding" something significant, ES and Reloaded are pushing ahead with the research. expanding the display bounds of research in the field, bringing access to the masses that is MORE credible. Speaking of that pic bloc: [IMG]http://farm1.static.flickr.com/143/346665385_95312b6d70_b.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://egypte.nikopol.free.fr/Geneve/Resources/montouhotep.jpeg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i525.photobucket.com/albums/cc332/kushkemet08/268_Egypt_Tiye.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i27.tinypic.com/ig9klv.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.timesonline.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00182/egyptmummy6R_182020a.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.homestead.com/wysinger/files/ramesesiic.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.osirisnet.net/tombes/pharaons/amenhotep3/photo/amenhotep3_head_02.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i525.photobucket.com/albums/cc332/kushkemet08/mural01.jpg[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3