...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
BERBERS the same as yesteryear : Forgotten Libyans of the Coast
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] ^ Lyinass dummy, pray tell where did I say the image of Ramses looked "Euro" or that "they lightened it up"?? Where or where is Dana a real female of intelligence instead of lyingass retards?? [QUOTE]Originally posted by dana marniche: [qb] This however flies in the face of more Eurocentric analyses being done by peoples like Maca Meyer, who as i am sure you are aware still look upon such people of Mechta Afalou as proto-Caucasoids of Iberian affinity. It just shows that modern scholarship by Europeans is also controversial. The main focus has been on trying to relate haplotype U6 to ancient Caucasoids in north Africa and East Africa. "U6 traces the first detectable Paleolithic return to Africa of ancient Caucasoid lineages. It has been mostly found in Northwest Africa, with a global estimated age of 47,000 years reflecting an old human continuity in that rather isolated area. The fact that in Europe it has only been detected in the Iberian Peninsula rules out a possible European route, unless a total lineage extinction in all the path is invoked. On the other hand, its presence in Northeast Africa [30], albeit in low frequencies, reinforces its way through North Africa.... Attested presence of Caucasian people in Northern Africa goes up to Paleolithic times...... U6, a maternal haplotype which originated in western Asia some 30,000 ago is very important ... The most probable origin of the proto-U6 lineage was the Near East. Around 30,000 years ago it spread to North Africa where it represents a signature of regional continuity. Subgroup U6a reflects the first African expansion from the Maghrib [see "Maghreb" ] returning to the east in Paleolithic times. " Someone on this forum posted some retort to her hypotheses about U6 which I will have to locate and make a copy of. I myself question why there are such low frequencies of U6 among these obviously european related populations in North Africa. The samples she takes are from some of the well -known localities of the white slave trade such as Ifren in Meknes where thousands were brought in from France. [/qb][/QUOTE]Indeed. The same silly games Eurocentrics played with analyses of physical remains is now being played with genetics. I can't tell you how many times in my research on early or proto-Berbers I have stumbled across the outdated Cavilli-Sforza claims of proto-Berbers and even proto-Afrasian speakers of Africa having more relation to Southwest Asians and Europeans than to Sub-Saharans even though Sub-Saharans possess the greatest diversity of Afrasian languages. Not to mention the archaeological connections between Capsian and sub-Saharan East Africa. The whole Eurasian claims behind E1b1b paternal lineage were already exploded but now the Eurocentrics desperately cling to U6. Even though most estimates on the age of U6 coincide with the first humans settling Europe in the first place not to mention the fact that U6 in Southwest Asia is at very low frequency and diversity compared North Africa where it likely originated. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3