...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
why Australian Aborigenes have straight hair
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by MissJennifer: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by AGÜEYBANÁ(Mind718): [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by MissJennifer: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by AGÜEYBANÁ(Mind718): [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by MissJennifer: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by cassiterides: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by asante: So your saying that black people are not real blacks unless they have curly hair and a wide nose? lol [/qb][/QUOTE]Negroids (Blacks) have wooly hair and wide/flat noses. Afronuts however have a different racial classification regarding who Black people are and they base it [b]solely[/b] on dark pigmentation. The obvious problem with doing this is that you end up clusting non-Negroid races as Negroid (Black). The main reason afronuts do this is because they self-hate Negroid features such as wooly hair and wide noses so it comforts them when they extend their race to include dark skinned non-negroid races who have straighter hair and thin noses. [/qb][/QUOTE]I happen to agree with this. Online, I notice a lot of Black poeple are very hypersenstive when you classify black as being darkskin, wide noses, and kinky hair; [/qb][/QUOTE]It's not so much as noting one phenotype amongst Africans as much as it's trying to hold all Africans throughout Africa to this specific phenotype and only this phenotype which in turn is stereotyping Africans with a "true Negroid" parameter when in actuality it's well known amongst the bio-anthropological community that in Africa, a vast continent where modern humans have lived for 200ky and have accumulated so much phenotypic and genetic diversity there are many different phenotypes that are all indigenous to Africa the Negroid phenotype is just one of many. Note the following for example... [QUOTE]Originally posted by AGÜEYBANÁ(Mind718): [i]The Cambridge researchers studied genetic diversity of human populations around the world and [b]measurements of over 6,000 skulls from across the globe[/b] in academic collections. Their research knocks down one of the last arguments in favour of multiple origins. [b]The new findings show that a loss in genetic diversity the further a population is from Africa is mirrored by a loss in variation in **physical attributes**.[/b] Lead researcher, Dr Andrea Manica from the University's Department of Zoology, explained: [b]"The origin of anatomically modern humans has been the focus of much heated debate. Our genetic research shows the further modern humans have migrated from Africa the more genetic diversity has been lost within a population. [/b] [b] "However, some have used skull data to argue that modern humans originated in multiple spots around the world. We have combined our genetic data with new measurements of a large sample of skulls to show definitively that modern humans originated from a single area in Sub-saharan Africa."[/b] [b]The research team found that genetic diversity decreased in populations the further away from Africa they were - a result of 'bottlenecks' or events that temporarily reduced populations during human migration.[/b] [b]They then studied an exceptionally large sample of human skulls. Taking a set of measurements across all the skulls the team showed that not only was variation highest amongst the sample from south eastern Africa but that it did decrease at the same rate as the genetic data the further the skull was away from Africa.[/b][/i] [/QUOTE][/qb][/QUOTE]The other phenotypes aren't as common though. [/qb][/QUOTE]So you mean to tell me you've traversed the whole of Africa seen all people and places, if not what are you going by to note this? [QUOTE]Originally posted by MissJennifer: [qb] you all make it seem as if its the majority when its not. [/qb][/QUOTE]I've never stated anything was the majority instead it's clearly noted that there's not the single phenotype throughout all of Africa. [QUOTE]Originally posted by MissJennifer: [qb] the negroid phenotype is the most common one.[/qb][/QUOTE]Accordong to whom Carelton Coon? lol Certainly not according to mainstream bio-anthroplogy. [QUOTE]Originally posted by MissJennifer: [qb] I haven't see any black africans who have narrow features and fine wavy hair that are not mixed. [/qb][/QUOTE]Then you need to do some more research before you post, tell me in your words who are these Africans with narrow features and wavy hair that are mixed and how, evidence please... [/QB][/QUOTE]You cannot claim that you have tranversed the entire continent to conclude that the negroid phenotype is NOT the most common one. But anyone with common sense and eyes can see that it IS the most common phenotype. Nobody needs some silly study done by anthropologists to know that the vast majority of black people with very little to NO mixing have kinky hair. Why are we trying to claim a certain look that is not even dominant in our race anyway??? Are you trying to say those with the common Negroid phenotype are inferior and ugly? Do you realize how you are offending ME and poeple in my family who look like this?? I am tired of African Americans online trying to argue that white is right, trying so hard to argue a certain phenotype that is not dominant or natural to our race. There is no tribe in Africa where the black poeple have lightskin, narrow features, and fine hair with no mixing. There are none and no one can name a tribe or show any proof that there is. I feel like you all are just self hating, you are ashamed to have the Negroid phenotype represent us because you have a deeply embedded inferiority complex. Instead you want to prove to non black races that our poeple can have straight hair, narrow noses and lightskin just like they do to feel better about yourselves. I see this same mentality on every forum when African Americans are discussing race; they start showing photos of colored people with mixed features and trying to pass them off as 'black' or saying they are just as 'black' as the pure west africans when it's a complete lie. [QUOTE]Then you need to do some more research before you post, tell me in your words who are these Africans with narrow features and wavy hair that are mixed and how, evidence please... Do you mean to tell me that magically some non Africans passed on genes only for nose and hair, but none for limb proportions which are noted amongst some to be more tropically adapted than many other African peoples and skin very dark in complexion? Doesn't sound logical now does it? There's many different environmental conditions throughout Africa different environments breed different cranio-facial phenotypes. [/QUOTE]That look is NOT dominant though (especially w/o mixing). It represents a very small percentage of the black racial phenotype. There are still MANY Ethiopians who have broad facial features; I was under the impression that they all had narrow features and fine hair but many do not. The narrow featured Ethiopians get noticed more obviously because of White supremacy but there are a lot who look like West Africans. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3