EgyptSearch Forums: Post A Reply

...

Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | faq | forum home

»	EgyptSearch Forums » Egyptology » real reconstructions (my artwork) » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message: HTML is not enabled. UBB Code™ is enabled.	[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Sweetnet: [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: *Amenhotep III is painted just as dark as Tiye, so if you paint Tiye that color (which is still too ambiguous to me), you have to paint Amenhotep just as dark. [/QUOTE]what do you mean "ambiguous"? ambiguous of what? [/QUOTE]^You should know, you're the one making a sport out of posting images with manipulated lighthing, just look at the Tut bust you've posted above. [/QUOTE]The picture I put up is of the Tut bust in daylighting. The ones that most people put up are from dark Gallery settings where a light is being shinned on the bust. I have to correct your here, those are the less natural ones. One of the familiar ones is the one with white on one side and jet black on the other. Those are not the natural background of the photo. That photo was taken in dark museum conditions where they shine a light on it making it look mysterious, then somebody photoshop a new black and white background in natural day lighting [IMG]http://www.griffith.ox.ac.uk/gri/gif-files/Ross_photo_0009.jpg[/IMG] museum lighting [IMG]http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcStYzta5dVOeRl_cFZEJHsJa9nZuPdW7ZoUKjEb5KHXC4MzwZH8i7Zq9A[/IMG] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Sweetnet: The image is ambiguous because the brown he used isn't natural (greyish brown), and could be interpretated as a swarthy person standing in the shade: [IMG]http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lqy81c8bId1qa7wvqo1_400.jpg[/IMG] http://marinadedave.com/storage/Yul%20Brynner-Ramses.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1312905693018 http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lpoxmyMZ5Q1qa7wvqo1_400.jpg [/QUOTE]this is a really dumb comment. this is an honest photo of the wood bust and I've seen it in person. It's not the bust's problem you think it's "ambiguous". If this is "ambiguous" thousands of other works of Egyptian art are also "ambiguous." [IMG]http://www.griffith.ox.ac.uk/gri/gif-files/Ross_photo_0009.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRZaVvxrPiqcUuhE4vM1OB6VpbwBSs69Nj2nT2LyDAmqm6Co1a16fLsIw[/IMG] Here's the Tut bust in dark gallery lighting: [IMG]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_rnwe9K2kqlM/TOsO1jo0e8I/AAAAAAAAB9g/WzDBDCfKrUM/s1600/king-tut-bust.jpg[/IMG] ^^^ now it's suddenly un-ambiguous ??? I can show you millions of people not from Africa that shade or darker so your point is completley irrelevant. I can also show you pure African Igbos who are lighter are they now "ambiguous" ? and now it's you promoting true negroism .reality is ambiguous despite your attempts to slant it. [/QB][/QUOTE]