...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ramesses III predicted E1b1a
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Truthcentric: [QB] BUMP [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb]The Maghrebi componant detected by Henn et al 2012 is the only Upper Palaeolithic signal in Northern Africa, and its low in Egyptian Berbers, let alone Nile Valley Egyptians. The rest (shown below as colors other than light blue) represent way more recent admixture events that undermine your retarded Ancient Egypt = Modern Egypt fantasies: [IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-yaSw-OSc9Vw/Tw9lXL1KBsI/AAAAAAAAEa8/ci33CRnJQ1c/s1600/henn2012_north_africa.png[/IMG] ^If my notion of population replacement, whether gradual or in otherwise, for a large portion of the Egyptian populace is so unsupported, explain these results. Other than their Maghrebi componant, which is ~20% in Modern Egyptians, where is the rest of their autosomal Upper Palaeolithic signal? Egypt was populated since way the light blue portion of their ancestry entered Northern Africa, and they have African mtDNA lineages to support this. Why was Henn et al 2012 unable to pick up on this segment of their genome? Explain, numbskull! [/qb][/QUOTE]Would I be correct in guessing that the green color in those graphs represents Arab ancestry that can be dated in large part to the Islamic conquests (at least for Egypt)? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3