...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ramesses III predicted E1b1a
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Amun-Ra The Ultimate: It's a bit ridiculous even for a stupid racist like you to say the MLI scores haven't been reproduced[/QUOTE]Correction: YOUR INTERPRETATION of the MLI scores has NEVER been reproduced. That's right. Not even once. On the other hand, you'll be hard pressed to find analyses which do not independently comfirm my interpretation of both the MLI scores and the TribeScores. Anyone familiar with crackpot theories will immediately classify your fairytales as such and recognize that you're full of sh!t: [QUOTE][b] How to Spot Pseudoscience [/b] Very few claims that aren't true actually qualify as theories. Let's review the four main requirements that a theory must fulfill. [b]1) A theory must originate from, and be well supported by, experimental evidence.[/b] Anecdotal or unsubstantiated reports don't qualify. [b]It must be supported by many strands of evidence,[/b] and not just a single foundation. You'll find that [b]most pseudoscience is supported by only a single foundation.[/b] 2) A theory must be specific enough to be falsifiable by testing. If it cannot be tested or refuted, it can't qualify as a theory. [b]And if something is truly testable, others must be able to repeat the tests and get the same results.[/b] You'll find that this feature is truly rare among pseudosciences; [b]they'll generally claim some excuse or make up a reason why it can't be tested or repeated by others.[/b] 3) A theory must make specific, [b]testable predictions about things not yet observed.[/b] 4) A theory [b]must allow for changes based on the discovery of new evidence.[/b] It must be dynamic, tentative, and correctable. You'll find that most pseudoscience does not allow for changes based on new discoveries.[/QUOTE][URL=http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4037] How to Spot Pseudoscience [/URL] Re: [i]And if something is truly testable, [b]others must be able to repeat the tests and get the same results.[/b][/i] and: [i]they'll generally [b]claim some excuse or make up a reason why it can't be tested or repeated by others.[/b][/i] ^Describes your fairytales perfectly since all of your claims (especially your idea of a literal interpretation of MLI scores) and testable predictions thereof have already been falsified by the literature on numerous occasions and when I challenge you to produce results that independently confirm your fairy tales you use your own interpretation to confirm the validity of your own interpretation, like a low IQ crackhead or you'll make excuses like a little evasive b!tch: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Amun-Ra The Ultimate: It's a bit ridiculous even for a stupid racist like you to say the MLI scores haven't been reproduced in literature[/QUOTE]SMH. :rolleyes: [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3