...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
The analysis of racial structure of early dynastic populations in Egypt
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Faheemdunkers: [qb] [QUOTE]''Faheem'', any reason in particular, why have you yet to reply to my post, that doesn't involve tails in between legs, peed pants and trembling knees? [/QUOTE]Hannihara's papers are based on population wholes, not individuals. You still evidently don't understand typology. "Africans" and "Europeans" are not races. They were only synonymous if you go back 20,000 or so years (although Africans then were divided into Capoids/Congoids). See the maps from Coon I posted on the changes during the post-pleistocene. [/qb][/QUOTE]^All the more evidence that your head is not functioning properly. What part in my posts refers to individuals, typology or races, in order for it to make sense that you randomly invoke such irrelevant issues when you address that excerpt of my post? Just admit it, it burns you, doesn't it? ''Berberic'', supposedly ''meso-prognathic'' Somali's with a lower Gnathic index (see M40/M5 in the table below) mean ratio than representatives of all the groups you've described as ''ortochnathous'' in your opening posts, including your precious Nordic epitomes of Caucasoidness: [IMG]http://i9.tinypic.com/4mvlojo.jpg[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3