...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Nubian aDNA: what the hell is stopping ES members from claiming CL Fox 1997?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Amun-Ra The Ultimate: [qb] Certainly not. Those people (Kikuyu, Hutu, Oromo, East Africans) are obviously African and they share a common origin with most other Africans like West Africans and Bantu at a time period after the OOA migrations. Your question doesn't even make sense. Are Kikuyu not Africans? Why do you say "than Africans", which they are themselves? [/qb][/QUOTE]I asked the question because Beyoku up above says that quote: [i]" does not exempt the fact that East Africans are closer to Eurasian populations. All one need to do is look at an East African population that we assume is not "Mixed"."[/i] So based on your statement above, is Beyoku wrong? Are Kikuyu, Oromo, Hutu etc, who are all East Africans, closer to Eurasians than other African populations? If not, where are the errors in Beyoku's claim? [/qb][/QUOTE]He will do one of two things. 1 - Not answer. 2 - Run away for a while only to come back and spew the same nonsense. Its funny I am the so called wacists when he sounds very simililar to the Euroclown playbook seen [URL=http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/showthread.php/41569-German-Dziebel-s-Out-of-America-origin-of-humanity-urheimat-hypothesis/page9]HERE.[/URL] Everything he is saying is thoroughly debunked because he doesn't actually READ the data. http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2014/10/08/008805.full.pdf He says that Khoi/Twa didn mix with other E/L3/M168 folks: DEBUNKED [QUOTE] Other studies (PRÜFER ET AL 2014, MEYER ET AL 2012, TISHKOFF ET AL 2009) have shown that, while the San and Mbuti are the most diverged from all other populations sampled, the Mandenka and Yoruba populations have only recently separated and the Dinka population shares some ancestry with non-African populations. [b]The San and Mbuti projections onto YRI show a slight excess of rare alleles, suggesting some admixture from their ancestors into the ancestors of YRI[/b] [/QUOTE]Note the above about the Dinka..........they "shares some ancestry with non-African populations." According to Amun Ra the troll that should not be the case since they are mostly A/B non L3 population. And remember : [QUOTE] These results mean that we have not identified any sub-Saharan African sample that we are confident has no evidence of back-to-Africa migration. [b]Our best candidate at present is the Dinka[/b] but it is possible that with a phased genome or large sample sizes we would detect evidence of non-African ancestry in this population as well. [/QUOTE][IMG]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-f0SM6wmjxww/U1lq1koSSwI/AAAAAAAAJks/_csA2iCuNGM/s1600/skoglund.png[/IMG] Dinka sit closest to Eurasians.....have less Neanderthal and Yoruba.....they are Primarily an A/B population........they share "some ancestry with non-African populations." yet they are the "best candidate at present" for a "sub-Saharan African sample that we are confident has no evidence of back-to-Africa migration" Anyone looking for the context of the quote can simply GOOGLE IT. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3