...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Nubian aDNA: what the hell is stopping ES members from claiming CL Fox 1997?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Amun-Ra The Ultimate: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [IMG]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-f0SM6wmjxww/U1lq1koSSwI/AAAAAAAAJks/_csA2iCuNGM/s1600/skoglund.png[/IMG] [/QUOTE]That's not a problem to me and doesn't contradict me in any way because Dinka in that graph (which is NOT about genetic distance btw) are still closer to Yoruba than they are to any of the Eurasian samples in the graph. As I said before, multiple times, of course if you divide a Yoruba town into 2 groups in a competely random fashion, due to random genetic drift (etc) one of the 2 group will be closer to Eurasian than the other group. [b]But they will still be closer to one another than they are to Eurasians.[/b] Even with 2 twins individuals, as a bit of a trivia, there will one closer to Eurasian populations than the other one (because it turns out [URL=http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-superhuman-mind/201211/identical-twins-are-not-genetically-identical]twins are not[/URL] genetically *exactly* similar although they are almost similar). Low level bi-directional admixtures through intermediary can also have some impact. [b]Dinka in your graph, which is not about genetic distance, are still closer to Yoruba than they are to any Eurasian populations. [/b] For Ancient Egyptian it's the same thing, according to current genetic results they are closer to sub-Saharan Africans (E1b1a, Great Lakes Africans, Southern Africans, West Africans, archaeological continuity, etc) than they are to Eurasians, North Africans or West Asians populations. See more about it here: BMJ study (Ramses III=E1b1a): http://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e8268 DNA Tribes autosomal analysis (Mummies aDNA more prevalent in modern Great Lakes, Southern and Western African populations): http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2012-01-01.pdf http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2013-02-01.pdf So, Ancient Egyptians are closer to sub-Saharan Africans (E1b1a, Great Lakes, etc) than they are to Europeans or West Asians populations despite having some low level Eurasian admixtures like during the Hyksos (Aamu/Asians) occupation and probably even during the foundation of Ancient Egypt (since neighboring populations -including with Eurasian nomadic tribes- always intermarry/intermix at low level). Despite this low level admixtures with Eurasians Ancient Egyptians still end up to be closer to Sub-Saharan Africans than Eurasians according to current genetic and archaeological study results. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3