...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Nubian aDNA: what the hell is stopping ES members from claiming CL Fox 1997?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [QUOTE][i] Other studies (PRÜFER ET AL 2014, MEYER ET AL 2012, TISHKOFF ET AL 2009) have shown that, while the San and Mbuti are the most diverged from all other populations sampled, the Mandenka and Yoruba populations have only recently separated and the Dinka population shares some ancestry with non-African populations. [b]The San and Mbuti projections onto YRI show a slight excess of rare alleles, suggesting some admixture from their ancestors into the ancestors of YRI[/b][/i] [/QUOTE][qb] Note the above about the Dinka..........they "shares some ancestry with non-African populations." According to Amun Ra the troll that should not be the case since they are mostly A/B non L3 population. And remember:[/qb] [QUOTE][i] These results mean that we have not identified any sub-Saharan African sample that we are confident has no evidence of back-to-Africa migration. [b]Our best candidate at present is the Dinka[/b] but it is possible that with a phased genome or large sample sizes we would detect evidence of non-African ancestry in this population as well.[/i] [/QUOTE][IMG]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-f0SM6wmjxww/U1lq1koSSwI/AAAAAAAAJks/_csA2iCuNGM/s1600/skoglund.png[/IMG] [qb] Dinka sit closest to Eurasians.....have less Neanderthal and Yoruba.....they are Primarily an A/B population........they share "some ancestry with non-African populations." yet they are the "best candidate at present" for a "sub-Saharan African sample that we are confident has no evidence of back-to-Africa migration" Anyone looking for the context of the quote can simply GOOGLE IT. [/qb][/QUOTE]This reminds me of the study 2016 Rotimi et al. [URL=https://www.nature.com/articles/srep26565]Ancient Human Migration after Out-of-Africa[/URL]. Tell me Beyoku, what is your take of study? Do you believe there were more than one OOA expansions? What about you Firewall or anyone else with sense? I personally believe there are sequential OOA ancestries that were made cryptic due to expansions of various Sub-Saharan ancestries (pre-Bantu) as well as later back-migrations from Eurasia. This is why Lazaridis' so-called 'Basal Eurasian' may very well be one of those subsequent OOA ancestries. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3