...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Theophile Obenga's "Negro-Egyptian" linguistic phylum
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Amun-Ra The Ultimate: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [qb] ^ [b]LOL[/b] Such conjectures again shows just how invalid the Negro-Egyptien phylum [/qb][/QUOTE]One of the problem is that you're only concentrating on the fact that the Negro-Egyptian phylum doesn't include Berber or Semitic. But the most important aspect of Obenga's study is that it includes almost all E and E-P2 carriers. It's the connection between the major African linguistic families that is Niger-Kordofanian (Niger-Congo/Bantu), Ancient Egyptian, Nilo-Saharan, Cushitic and Chadic language family. [b]Showing that all those family groups descent from the same ancestor language.[/b] Many linguists are already beginning to think Niger-Kordofanian and Nilo-Saharan are descended from the same language which they call Niger-Saharan or Kongo-Saharan. It's not a stretch to think other language families spoken in Africa such as Ancient Egyptian, Cushitic and Chadic are also descendants of the same ancestor language. It would explain why Africans are genetically close to each other (and look like each other). It would explain why almost all Africans are from the E and E-P2 haplogroups and why Ancient Egyptian STR alleles values and Ramses III haplogroup cluster and match African people not Semites or West Asians. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3