...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
DNATribes North African Region
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] Yo. I am NOT putting faith in DNATribes. I am saying their current(2013) classification makes more sense. And they have moved away from their old classification and labels. The term Sahara-Arab is about right. Why? Because of this. [IMG]http://i47.tinypic.com/1085ug8.jpg[/IMG] Saharan and SSA migrants into South Arabia. Where some of us is getting confused, the migration was into Arabia and not the otherway around. As I pointed out in another thread if the migration was into the Sahara region. The West Asian(Turkish) SNP would have migrated along with Sahara-Arabia SNPs. But what we see is a clear pattern of ALL African(Saharan/SSA/NEast) into Arabia into Persia. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [qb] I think Xyman puts too much faith in DNATribes for them to say they are "coming around". Such organizations are still plagued with the usual bias. As for the Sahel, it's funny how even among the most "negroid" populations of the Sahel region don't usually get lumped in with North Africans or Eurasians even though DNA studies show they do. I am automatically reminded of Tishkoff study of the Dogon. [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3