...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
DNATribes North African Region
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Amun-Ra The Ultimate: [qb] It seems U6 is North African but its parent haplogroup U originate outside Africa. If you say U6 is African originally then you must say all his parents and grandparents mtDNA are African (that is Haplogroup U, Haplogroup R and Haplogroup N). I guess everything is possible but it seems like a stretch. I still stand by my position that current Berbers people have some relatively high level of admixture with foreign DNA. Although it is strange since their Y-DNA (Haplogroup E) is mostly African in origin. It's hard to imagine foreign migrants bringing with them much more women than men. Maybe the migrants men were eliminated somehow at some early point during a conflict or something. [/qb][/QUOTE]Not necessarily so. Just because a clade originated in Africa does not mean its mother clade originated in Africa as well. Yes we know most U derived clades exist outside of Africa but U6 and probably U5 arose in Africa. Another thing to remember is that the likely origin of these Eurasian clades is Southwest Asia. Southwest Asia is right next to Africa and as was explained many times the paleolithic populations among which these clades arose were not much different from their African brethren right next door. So exactly where is the genetic divide between them and Africans?? This seems to be a big Eurocentric ruse-- that Eurasian means totally distinct from African when such was not the case. As Keita put it: [i] The issue of how much Paleolithic migration from the Near East there may have been is intriguing, and the mitochondrial DNA variation may need to be reassessed as to what can be considered to be only of "Eurasian origin" because if hunters and gatherers roamed between the Saharan and supra-Saharan regions and Eurasia it might be difficult to determine exactly "where" a mutation arose.-- Keita, In Hot Pursuit of Language in Prehistory ed. John Benjamins.[/i] (2008) Even before the advent of genetics many Western scholars recognized a continuity between the populations of Southwest Asia (Arabia & the Levant) and North Africa via skeletal remains and such was only strengthened in recent times by genetics. Unfortunately this gave the Euronuts license to segregate North Africa from the rest of Africa and extradite it to Eurasia. We know such is ridiculous fallacy and a futile attempt to white-wash North Africa and even deny Southwest Asia's black roots. As I even pointed out there are 'Eurasian' clades found in Sub-Sahara as well among populations which Euronuts aren't so keen to claim. This is why folks like Mathilda and her lackey Lyinass fail every time. Lyinass who is desperate to deny or ignore black Berbers but claim fair-skinned types no matter how un-Caucasian their features may be. :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3