...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Question on the Pirke de R. Eliezer
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] ^I'm done talking to you. That fat chunk of abstract text that you didn't even write yourself adds no value to my previous exchange with you and Djehuti. No one knowledgeable on the subject needs confirmation that the alleged ''Shasu of Yahweh'' lived outside Judea, that they were pastoralists or any of the other descriptions that were already implied in my previous post. You pop sh!t and when I ask you to explain what's inconsistent about my labelling a Syrian Canaanite a ''Shasu'', [/QUOTE][/qb] because you didn't label it. Somebody else mislabeld it on the internet and you merely copied the error. Now you are not man enough to admit it even though it's a minor boo boo. Am I the only one "man" enough to do occasional retractions? Will somebody else step up to the plate and grow a testicle? [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: That fat chunk of abstract text [/QUOTE]you seem not to know the meaning of the word "abstract" It is not applicable to that very non-abstract text on Shasu [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: Because you're a troll. Djehuti and Doug are right in that you always cherry pick the lightest examples you can find, even on the occasions when they're clearly purposefully white-washed. Only someone with a hidden agenda would pick, and then go on to defend, a lightened facsimile of a mural over the real one, when the sub discussion is explicitly about the skin colour of Canaanites and whether their skin colour was reason for Judaean authors to group them with Africans. Bye Lioness. [/QB][/QUOTE]Doug's highly parnoid at all times. Doug has nevr made a post without the word "Euroecentric" in it. He's obsessed with the pale man like Mike. And Defruity has a high degree of little twirp tendancies so you can't go by them. No I don't accept bad quality ameutur photos such as this to represent accurate color and light [IMG]http://www.bible-archaeology.info/Copy_of_2Beni-Hassan-Asiatiques1.jpg[/IMG] I put up many dark skinned AE pics from the Theban Mapping Project as well as a recent Siptah thread doing the same ^^^ the discussion is about Asiatics and in this poor qulaity photo it's hard to make out details in the hair and faces and so on. It's easier to see the costume differences as with the previous posts the Egyyptians often distinguished ethnic groups by their dress and hair/beard styles That's why I put up this: [IMG]http://www.ephotobay.com/image/picture-26-38.png[/IMG] Now I'm sorry that putting up this rang your skin alarm that you think these Asiatics aren't dark enough compared to that bad quality photo but skin is another topic. [IMG]http://www.ephotobay.com/image/picture-23-33.png[/IMG] ^^^^ I'm sorry that ypu feel that people of this skin tone are not Black but why don't you save that for your Paper Bag Test thread? big ups to my high yella sistahs [IMG]http://nationalmirroronline.net/thumbnail.php?file=/Monalisa_376781972.jpg&size=article_large[/IMG] Mona Lisa Chinda, Nigeria [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3