...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Uncovering the Origins of Ancient Egypt
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Faheemdunkers: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: QUOTE][b]YOU[/b] don't know what typology is, as evinced by your posting a pitch black Nilote man that you labelled ''Negroid'', but who wouldn't fall into either of Wiercinsky's Sub Saharan African (whether Bushman or Negroid proper or Pygmy) categories, nor fit the descriptions of the Negroid typology that you've listed many times here on Egyptsearch.[/QUOTE]Nilotids are Negroid in their metrics/non-metrics. What exactly is non-Negroid about them? When I asked that last time, you ran away. Nilotids have been classified as Negroids by typologists since the early 20th century. You claimed the Nilotid posted was mesorrhine, when his nasal index is platyrrhine. The plate XIII is from Dixon (1923) with metric data. Dixon's description: "The Nilotic Negro [Nilotid] may therefore be characterized as a very tall, very black people, with typical Negro hair and marked prognathism". [QUOTE] [i]Exactly, so how can you be so adamant that Wiercinski was right that her clusters represents [b]the presence of actual Nordics, Cromagnonoids, Horners, Negroids etc, in the proportions that she says they were present?[/b] What credibility does this table have, if, as you say, there is no clear cut link between ancestry and type[/i] --Swenet [/QUOTE]It shows what trait complexes/racial types existed in the pre-dynastic egyptian population (5500 - 3000 BC). And that study merely confirmed all the others (Michalski, 1958; Wiercinski, 1973). The typological/individualist cranial analyses utilising the Polish method have always been consistent in estimation: Aethiopid ('Berberic'): 40% Mediterranean: 30% Orientalids (Irano-Afghanid/Iranid): 20% All the other types in single figures. Yea, no one ever claimed there were large amounts of Nordics [that's a straw man Afrocentrics love to set up] in predynastic egypt. Even my old essay "Nordic Egypt" estimated Nordics at a single figure prior to 3000 BC, alongside Armenoids, and Negroid types. [QUOTE]Its one thing to say the Egyptian skulls cluster with Eurasians, Horners and West Africans in that analysis, and a totally different thing to say that those Ancient Egyptian individuals originate from the nations they were allocated to by Wiercinsky.[/QUOTE]No they don't originate there via lineage. The traits however did in the past as a center of crystallization. That's what makes the types non-arbitrary. [QUOTE]You're dumber than a phucking rock. You're a phuckin buffoon. You don't even realize that this statements undermines typology--which is basically everything your confused dysfunctional azz stands for.[/QUOTE]"The concept of individual races (individual typology) which utilises the notion of the racial type to denote a group of human individuals [b]irrespective their populational descent[/b] and resembling each other in a set of racial traits." (Wiercinski, 1975) Typology is polydimensional clustering, nothing more. The same way you can group together any object, based on their physical similarities. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3