...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Mummy Genetics Study May Be Prelude To Widespread Genome Mapping Of Ancient Egyptians
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: [QB] [QUOTE] As with any scientific discipline, there can be models devised for this, where the effect of uncertainty inducing variables is minimized by including them into the TMRCA equation. [/QUOTE]Good, mr. goofball, who supposedly knows "how science works" more than anybody: start by telling me how the "effect of uncertainty inducing variables is minimized" in making it magically possible to get reliably-concrete dating on a gene(s) clearly under positive selection [QUOTE] That’s a question YOU need to ask yourself, dummy. I get the feeling that you still don’t understand how retarded you sound when you equate the assimilation of new groups with the elimination of population segments.[/QUOTE]LOL. I need to ask myself a question around some dumb allegation that none other than you had made. What warped up planet do you come from, seriously? Besides, if you are not advocating "replacement", then why does Ethiopian mtDNA and Y-DNA gene pool profile not fit into your south Arabian-origin fairy tale? [QUOTE] [QUOTE] Originally posted by The Explorer: Then you are guilty of a non-sequitur, since the inherent message of your placement of a "Semitic origin" onto Ethiopia's supposedly "Eurasian"-derived mtDNA, is predicated on the spread of that language phylum with said genes. Otherwise, you would not have made the connection between "Semitic" origin and the supposed "Eurasian" mtDNA in Ethiopia.[/QUOTE]You’re simply rephrasing your earlier garbage, which I had already flushed down the toilet by schooling you on the fact that the connection I made still stands despite the mtDNA conformity of the speakers in question, since the spread of mtDNAs need not co-vary with the languages of the migrating parties.[/QUOTE]Facts are not generated magically, because you call any nonsense that comes out of you as such. You'll have to do a lot more than just empty barking. Who says that mtDNA cannot correlate to the language distribution, while Y-DNA can, and why! Dummy, do these markers come with people...who speak a language? [QUOTE] [QUOTE] Originally posted by The Explorer: but I effectively captured your logic:[/QUOTE]That I’m right in that you distorted what I said can be easily seen in that your paraphrase of what I allegedly said doesn’t even conform to what you’re accusing me of elsewhere [/QUOTE]Cutting off my post, and then completing them with phantom acknowledgements isn't going to magically remove them from the realm of fiction of your own making. LOL [QUOTE](i.e., on one occasion you say I supposedly spoke of different mtDNA bearing Eurasian groups impacting Ethiopian groups and on the other occasion [when you see non-sequitors where there are none] you say I argue that the mtDNA profiles of Ethiopian Cushitic and Semitic speakers are interchangeable).[/QUOTE]So, who's doing the paraphrasing now, eh? Where do I apply the word "interchangeable"? Furthermore, it's not mutually exclusive for you to be forced to acknowledge the lack of differentiation of content in Ethiopian Cushitic and Semitic speakers gene pools, where the supposed "non-African" lineages are concerned, and for you to suggest--as you actually have--that this could have come about, as the only other alternative to your frivolous "Semitic origin" theory, through different Eurasian groups supposedly indiscriminately introducing different types of so-called "non-African" lineages into and across the diverse language-speaking Ethiopian populations. [QUOTE] You can’t even get your sh!t together. You’re being called out for more than enough phuckups to be tripping over your own words. Keep you pants up, bwoy.[/QUOTE]The problem isn't me; it's your inability to understand plain English. [QUOTE] [QUOTE] Originally posted by The Explorer: that the Yemeni gene pool would be more likely to show strong correspondence with Ethiopians, if your nutty south Arabian origins were in fact, closer to fact than fiction.[/QUOTE]It still hasn’t dawned on you that the Yemenite proper population pre-dates the South Arabian speakers, has it?[/QUOTE]Well, apparently, it has not "dawned on you" that "Yemenites" ARE/were "south Arabians"! Unless, you are advocating "replacement", you haven't a leg to stand on, as to why Ethiopian DNA profiles are incompatible with your goofy South Arabian origin theory, that you merely parrot without the foggiest idea of why, other than just being a good sap for psychological conditioning by other ideologues. [QUOTE] Otherwise it would have occurred to you that using Yemenites as a proxy for the said South Arabian speakers is self-expository of your rather marginal understanding of the issue at hand, without me having to clue you into this fact 4 times in a row.[/QUOTE]The loon takes it for granted that living Ethiopians, whose DNA we talk about, are "proxy" for the ancient Semitic-speaking Ethiopians, but that living Yemeni, are somehow transplanted aliens from somewhere else, who have no relevance to the dynamics of the history of cultural interaction across the Red Sea...all this in the name of being stumped and frustrated by the fact that Ethiopian gene profiles do not sit well with a south-Arabian origin. [QUOTE] [QUOTE] Originally posted by The Explorer: of having to contend with a lack of strong genetic correspondence between south Arabian populations and Ethiopians.[/QUOTE]This just proves the above, i.e., that your cosmic unsophistication in these matters is what leads you to conclude that all Yemenites are South Arabian speakers, and that you, in your astronomic obtuseness, even try to turn a linguistic clade into a geographic population (i.e., South Arabian languages).[/QUOTE]1. Cite where I "conclude that all Yemenites are "South Arabian" speakers", and thus show me how much of your "cosmic sophistication" in reading is doing good by you. 2. Do you know what "South Arabians" are? Did you know that South Arabia is geography? Did you know that "Yemenites" live(d) on what is called South Arabia? 3. Use your supposed "cosmic sophistication" to show me why Ethiopian gene pool profiles don't fit your goofy South Arabian origin. [QUOTE]He-who-takes-the-cake-in-obtuseness, stop being such a knuckle head. The Ethiopian component in question shows genetic traces of admixture events that can be dated to less than 3kya—a conclusion you’ve been pathetically trying to avoid ever since that abstract was posted. It’s a wrap, bwoy, you’re done.[/QUOTE]numbnut, explain how "being relatively closer to" a group, magically turns the former into the latter...and you are quite convince that you have some "cosmic sophistication" in matters of genetics that I supposedly lack, and not the numb-nutted blockhead that you actually conform to, to the letter? This, I've got to see. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3