...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Mummy Genetics Study May Be Prelude To Widespread Genome Mapping Of Ancient Egyptians
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: Exactly. Was not so bad to admit your gaping failure, now was it?[/QUOTE]Now that you've got those clown urges out of your system, take another look--these still remain at large: 1. [b]Tell me how something of that nature is a candidate for concrete dating[/b]?...[recap--given that non-neutral genes throw off track any predictability factor about either the pace or temporal inclinations of mutation] 2. While at it, when will you grow the balls to substantiate [b]what makes the SLC24A5 gene, as found in Ethiopians, and the San bushmen, "non-African"[/b], other than this being nothing more than ideological hotair that makes you feel good? These matters aren't going to disappear, just because your idea of competence is to cut posts and paste them onto your fairy tales. [QUOTE]LMAO. ’’found in Ethiopians and the San bushmen'', as if the incidence of finding it in other African groups (for whatever reason, i.e., even if indigenous) discounts an Eurasian origin of the allele [i]in the case of Ethiopians[/i] who indeed have Eurasian input dating to 3kya. [/QUOTE]You are obviously milking time to obscure your frivolous allegation about the SLC24A5 genes--found in said African--being "non-African". Your tooth-fairy rendition as to why they are "discounted" isn't going to get you off the hook; that's to say: deliver the answers with less whiny, more fetchy, bitch! [QUOTE] There is really no reason to mention San SLC24A5, unless you can clue me in to the evidence you’re withholding from me, that shows that the allele has a related history in both cases.[/QUOTE]There's an obvious reason, but you are notoriously absentminded: you treated the SLC24A5 gene as "non-African". Hence, the overdue of your demonstration as to how the gene in either the San or Ethiopians serve as such. [QUOTE] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: start by telling me [b]how[/b] the [b]"effect of uncertainty inducing variables is minimized" in making it magically possible to get reliably-concrete dating on a gene(s) clearly under positive selection[/b][/QUOTE]No refutation of what I said, because you can’t.[/QUOTE]You are right, I can't refute [b]empty[/b] gobbledygook made apparently by an empty-headed goofball. Let me know when you don't have an air-headed reply to the highlighted request above. [QUOTE]Uniparental evidence doesn’t show that Ethiopia's foreign ancestry is primarily from groups other than Yemenites, who live more towards West Asia? Prove it (this is going to be hilarious)![/QUOTE]LOL, "prove it"? dumbmass, [b]your own source[/b] has been reapplied to penetrate that very point into your blockhead, with regards to shutting down your goofy south Arabian origin story; that's # 1. As for me "proving it", that ship had sailed more than [b]3 years ago[/b], long before your source caught on. I just recaptured involved-material in a remotely-related thread days ago: I'll grant you that it's going to be "hilarious" to see you fumble with addressing that with potent counter-feedback. [QUOTE]Either this is another incidence of you lying, or its your amnesia rearing its head again. Produce a citation where I said that mtDNA ’’cannot correlate to the language distribution while Y-DNA can’’.[/QUOTE]Good. Since, we've now establish that you are not saying the above, then explain why you attribute a "Semitic origin" to Ethiopian mtDNA gene pool, when you obviously have no material groundwork to base it on? [QUOTE]In the face of knowing South Arabian speakers came from the Levant, and are a separate entity from the older Yemenite population, simply their sharing of the same land (South Arabia) in modern times, means they can just recklessly be used as proxies for one another? [/QUOTE]This post only reaffirms the fact that you are a complete idiot who has neither a clue as to what south Arabia is or what Yemenites are. Maybe you should learn what either are first, before jumping the gun on goofy stories of a "south Arabian" origin. [QUOTE]Say it aint so Explorer, I knew you were in the clinch with your mental faculties, but you can’t be that astronomically stupid![/QUOTE]I can't say you are not an absentminded fuckhead; doing so, would be lying. [QUOTE] Firstly, I recently schooled you on the fact that the isolated Ethiopian component was [i]relatively[/i] closer to Levantines, vis a vis Yemenites; not absolutely closer.[/QUOTE]LOL. Now you try to convince yourself of the prospect of "schooling" people on self-incriminating material from your own source, which obviously caught you off-guard. Hence, all the panicky scrambling for fruitless excuses. [QUOTE] Secondly, this repeated talk of ’’intergalactic travel’’ and ’’aliens’’ is, as already noted, indicative of your mental figments, which we know by now, have quite a stronghold on your dementing neurones.[/QUOTE]I call it as it is; your nutty stories are as good as fiction. You should actually consider it a gratuitous compliment, that I'm equating it with anything as remotely coherent as "intergalactic travel". [QUOTE] [QUOTE]Cite where I "conclude that all Yemenites are "South Arabian" speakers"[/QUOTE]Why else would you drool and get over-zealous over Pagani et al’s observation that the Ethiopian component evinces greater affinity to Levantines than Yemenites? [/QUOTE]Ok. You are coming clean on the fact that you are not in possession of an actual quote to the effect of your fairy tale allegation. [QUOTE]I will. Right after you catch me saying this is so. [/QUOTE]Then I'll get right to it: You in effect said that the idea of Ethiopians positioning relatively closer to the Levantines, even though it busts your myth about a south Arabian origin, still renders them "Eurasian". Demonstrate how so! [QUOTE] In the meantime, while you’re searching for something that doesn’t exist, you can prove this observation about you doesn’t hold weight: [i] The Ethiopian component in question shows genetic traces of admixture events that can be dated to less than 3kya— [b]a conclusion you’ve been pathetically trying to avoid ever since that abstract was posted.[/b][/i] --Swenet Oops, forgot. You already proved it to be true when you ignored it when I said it the first time around. [/QUOTE]"forgeting" is the least of your ineptitude problems; you are too stumped to even recognize that our whole exchange revolves around this very goofy spam in your fruitless re-copy & paste effort. A brick can put in more brain effort than you can possibly ever imagine achieving. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3