...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Mummy Genetics Study May Be Prelude To Widespread Genome Mapping Of Ancient Egyptians
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] If you say so. In the real world, however, level-headed posters will realize: --that your vague comments about the independent origins of LP associated alleles do not even begin to address or contradict the post they're targeting. To the contrary, such a view is rather compatible with my posts. In fact, 13915*G having an independent origin is what makes it a useful polymorphic allele in the first place, that can be used to determined who Ethiopians inherited it from, and the upper bound of such an admixture date. Additionally, its also not clear from the article whether 13915*G was one of the newly detected mutations. But, as we all know, trolls are not particularly concerned with making sense of their dumb ass posts. Initially, when you first posted the irrelevant Tiskoff bit, I didn't want to say it, but, since you're denying the patently obvious conclusion that your post has zero relevancy, I'm going to go ahead and clue you in to the fact that your source says that all four LP associated alleles are dated and that the dates match with the archaeological record. This is another smack in the face of your theory that ''genes under selection cannot be reliably dated''. --that the admixture event of 3kya cannot be falsified with the vague, mindless mumbo jumbo references you have in mind, since the said methods cannot distinguish between the split of Levantine ancestral Ethio-Semitic speakers from the Levantine Proto-Semitic community ~6kya, and the admixture event 3kya which led to Ethiopian populations inheriting the said varations. They will simply pick up on the former event, not the latter. Therefore, the TMCRA dates older than 3kya, but younger than ~7kya, of most non mtDNA L, U6 and M1 Ethiopian haplogroups cannot falsify the 3kya admixture event established by Pagani et al. Heck, even haplotype TMRCAs that are older than that don't necessarily refute Pagani et al's admixture date of 3kya. Pagani et al used another method to arrive at their conclusions, which you still haven't refuted, and [b]CANNOT[/b] refute. Hence, you pathetically resort to the next best thing; troll baiting others into talking about [i]their interpretations of/take on[/i] Pagani et al, rather than taking it up with the paper itself. No stalling, troll, do it right here! Bring into question the results obtained by Pagani et al, that left you butt hurt since the first page of this thread. Do it right here, for everyone to see. --that irrelevant exact matches of Egyptian and Ethiopian mtDNAs do not even begin to address what was posted, since, like the rest of your shabby post, its not incompatible with what I posted. It wouldn't be more random if you were to randomly post a news article about the VMAs in response to my post. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3