...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
A European population in Minoan Bronze Age Crete
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] When reading articles such as this one the first thing I check out is who are the authors/researchers. Who is the lead ie big dog. This paper is written by a bunch of “nobodies” and no acclaimed geneticist has put his/her name on it. BUT!!! ……Unlike Euros I do not focus on the personalities but I look at the data. So let’s look at the data. In short …there is no new disclosure here. What I have noticed is there is a pattern in the use of the word “affinity’ etc. Many here and on the race forums hear ……or see “affinity” and their knee jerk reaction is “origin’. The issue is really “origin” and not “affinity” of peoples during Neolithic times to the colonial times. Isn’t it? Good, we got that out of the way. Case in point is the Henn thread. Some read affinity and hear North Africans are migrants from Arabia. That is NOT what Henn reported. Similarly that study on Etruscan DNA by Macualay et al.concluding the Etruscans were from Anatolia. 1 year later Babujani/Bramanti et al reassessed the same data and showed a mis-interpretation and that ancient Anatolians AND the Etruscans had the similar ancestral population, ie peoples further SOUTH!!!, they are not sure where(wink wink). That is where the use of HAPMAP will come in useful. I got to get on it. Anyways , Anatolians are NOT the ancestral population of the Etruscans. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3