...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Siwan Language
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Troll Patrol: [QB] @ The Explorer, I am typing from my iPad. "As I do often." It's easer to type a new message instead of selecting text in quotations. It's tiresome when doing so on the iPad. But anyway, the way I understand genetic mutation occurrence is by, influence based on environment, this can be climate and nutrition. My interpretation for the E-M81 mutation is the region of the Maghreb. As I have posted underwent a climate change and shifts, during the same timeframe the age of the mutation was estimated. In this case ecology occurrence and genetics show similarities. To answer your question whether I propose the Tuareg as the spinoff population, yes I do consider the nomadic, pastoralist Tuaregs as the prominent population considering the follis records and the age of Hg E-V68. Ironically how the Ténéré is in Niger. From they come/ came. [QUOTE]Trans-Saharan craniometry.[b] Principal components analysis of craniometric variables closely allies the early Holocene occupants at Gobero, who were buried with Kiffian material culture, with Late Pleistocene to mid-Holocene humans from the Maghreb and southern Sahara referred to as Iberomaurusians, Capsians and “Mechtoids.” [/b] Outliers to this cluster of populations include an older Aterian sample and the mid-Holocene occupants at Gobero associated with Tenerean material culture. [/QUOTE] http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0002995 [QUOTE] Carrying out biological or genetic investigations of the Tuareg has not always been easy because of their demanding lifestyle and their often negative attitude to the European colonists. Cavalli-Sforza et al,2 whose synthesized study of classical protein and serological markers is well known, noticed a genetic link between the Tuareg and Beja from Eastern Sudan. The fact that the genetic distances between the Tuareg and Berber/North-western Africans were larger than that between the Tuareg and Beja, provides a picture of a common origin and population separation at some point more than 5000 years ago. Interestingly, both people are also pastoralist and speak Afro-Asiatic languages, even if the Beja language (Bedawi), with its four dialects, belongs to the Cushitic branch, whereas Tamasheq belongs to the Berber branch. The fact that these two peoples today speak different languages might be explained either by the Tuareg having acquired the Berber language during their westwards migration, or possibly by the Beja coming under the influence of some Eastern African peoples as language shift is a relatively common phenomenon.[...] The Tuareg population from Libya was homogenous with very low estimates of haplotype diversity suggesting high genetic drift.5 [/QUOTE]--Luísa Pereira, Viktor Černý I didn't read the paper myself, I went by what the poster stated on wiki. But considering the Beja-Tuareg relation is not "unlikely". [QUOTE][i]Coming to similar conclusions as the Cruciani and Trombetta team, Battaglia et al. (2008), [/i] writing prior to the discovery of E-V68, describe Egypt as "a hub for the distribution of the various geographically localized M78-related sub-clades" and, based on archaeological data, they propose that the point of origin of E-M78 (as opposed to later dispersals from Egypt) may have been in a refugium which "existed on the border of present-day Sudan and Egypt, near Lake Nubia, until the onset of a humid phase around 8500 BC. [/QUOTE] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_E-V68 [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3