...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Population Affinities of the Jebel Sahaba Skeletal Sample (Holliday 2013)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Alright, butthead, humor me: How is the body shape determined! We know that you don't know what 'allusion' means; now let's see what you know about body shape.[/QUOTE]You're lying again I see. There is nothing in my post that suggests I misinterpreted your post. As for the your gaping stupidity where post-cranial analysis is concerned, if you knew anything about bodyplan research and Holiday's work it would have occurred to you that Holiday's reference to ''log shape data'' in that dendrogram description negates your uneducated speculation about whether the dendrogram refers to limb proportions. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Your "updated different" observation of San limb data is?[/QUOTE]I see you're too confused to understand that you're talking gobbledygook right now, so I won't bother telling you that no disagreement on my part was expressed about your random invocation of San limb proportions. I will, however, tell you that you're a troll and that you need to start addressing what I said, rather than talking out the side of your neck. [QUOTE]It must suck to be an asshole/you.[/QUOTE]Unlike your uneducated troll face I actually have the paper. There are two dendrograms from that paper, prove that either one of them doesn't depict Egypt as among the Pygmy sample's closest neighbours. That excerpt doesn't even deny the fact that Pygmies have always clustered with Dynastic Egyptians in Holiday's research, it just says that in that particular analysis Pygmies came out on the other end of 'linearity', not that Egyptians and African Americans aren't near the other side of that border. Uneducated trolls always talk smack but never have anything to back it up. [QUOTE]Ask a kindergartener to tell you what "other reports" means. While at it, get a lesson on how to read the remainder of a post.[/QUOTE]You're lying again. Nothing in my posts about your retarded attempt to juxtapose cranio-metric data with bodyplan data suggest that I misinterpreted ''other reports''. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: How about the Ohalo specimen being thrown into the mix, because it is an upper Paleolithic [b]Levantine[/b] specimen, and could prove insightful in demonstrating that there is a general trend in differentiation between the Mesolithic north African series and counterparts from the Levant? That obviously did not cross your mind. [/QUOTE]Stop lying already. You habitually misrepresent your data, like with the your ''nasal index'' data, and you got called out for it. Contrary to your false presentation of Ohalo II as such, the specimen is not Natufian. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3