...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Population Affinities of the Jebel Sahaba Skeletal Sample (Holliday 2013)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: You're lying again I see. There is nothing in my post that suggests I misinterpreted your post. As for the your gaping stupidity where post-cranial analysis is concerned, if you knew anything about bodyplan research and Holiday's work it would have occurred to you that Holiday's reference to ''log shape data'' in that dendrogram description negates your uneducated speculation about whether the dendrogram refers to limb proportions.[/QUOTE]I see that you are being your usual very childishly emotional self with no substance. How is "body shape" determined? [QUOTE]I see you're too confused to understand that you're talking gobbledygook right now, so I won't bother telling you that no disagreement on my part was expressed about your random invocation of San limb proportions.[/QUOTE]You crying like a spoiled infant about my observation on the San being supposedly "silly and obselete" sounds like a clear disagreement to me. [QUOTE] I will, however, tell you that you're a troll and that you need to start addressing what I said, rather than talking out the side of your neck.[/QUOTE]Okay, you are good at calling me names, you likely don't even understand. What else is new? [QUOTE] [QUOTE]It must suck to be an asshole/you.[/QUOTE]Unlike your uneducated troll face I actually have the paper.[/QUOTE]Yet with such an access, unlike my "uneducated troll face", the piece I quoted must have eluded you, given your uncultured reaction to the prospect of putting Holliday on record on the subject of pygmies. [QUOTE] There are two dendrograms from that paper, prove that either one of them doesn't depict Egypt as among the Pygmy sample's closest neighbours. That excerpt doesn't even deny the fact that Pygmies have always clustered with Dynastic Egyptians in Holiday's research, it just says that in that particular analysis Pygmies came out on the other end of 'linearity', not that Egyptians and African Americans aren't near the other side of that border. Uneducated trolls always talk smack but never have anything to back it up.[/QUOTE]The day your dumbass can perform a lick of reading, will be the day hell freezes over. The piece is in fact saying what your tramp-ass is now humorously denying, that the pygmies were an outlier among their sub-Saharan group, where body linearity was concerned. Quoting from the horses' mouth is backing "it" up, silly donkey. [QUOTE]Stop lying already. You habitually misrepresent your data, like with the your ''nasal index'' data, and you got called out for it. Contrary to your false presentation of Ohalo II as such, the specimen is not Natufian. [/QUOTE]You are just too retarded to do a simple thing as reading a post in its entirety, so you can understand what's being said, as opposed to keeping your bug eye on tidbits --like a bull mesmerized by a red rag -- that you can zealously misread. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3