...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Population Affinities of the Jebel Sahaba Skeletal Sample (Holliday 2013)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: Your astronomic stupidity goes through the roof. You don't even know that a set of digits with the tilde symbol behind it in this context depicts an approximation. No surprise, really, with all your other recent phuckups bathing in broad daylight.[/QUOTE]My "astronomic stupidity" could not be as astronomic as your's. Otherwise, you wouldn't have made such a big deal about an "approximation", and one with essentially little difference at that, from the value you were making such a fuss about. [QUOTE]I'm sure that that's why you posted it. Cause, lord knows, your desperate hammering on their limb data in the absence of even a hint of opposition to their limb data (other than the opposition you fabricated with your lie), and in light of the other data posted in this thread (The Afalou/Circumpolar cluster), isn't exactly jiving with the hard data at hand, showing them to cluster away from Africans where the multivariate data is concerned.[/QUOTE]They cannot be "clustering away from Africans" on the account of the tropical body proportions or tropical body plan, which is what you've been denying for a while...that any such affinity exists. You have been hell bent on saying that they only had affinities with Europeans, when in fact if anything ,it is both the Mesolithic Maghrebi and UP Europeans who would cluster with "Africans" before they did with Europeans in their average body plans and limb proportions. [QUOTE] Which, as late as the proportions still appear, further stamps in the ground your pseudo-scientific idea that IM limb proportions further your hopeless cause, especially in light of Holiday 2013's multivariate analysis.[/QUOTE]Rather than reading the underhanded point that you were comparing apples with oranges, you've come up with a misguided conclusion. Why would a retention of tropical limb proportions render my cause "hopeless"? It certainly doesn't advance your cause that the EpiPaleolithic Maghrebi were some little lost Europeans in Africa, does it? [QUOTE]No, troll. Too late for damage controll. You were asked what linearity has to do with ''long lower-limb bones''. And no, me drilling on this issue isn't going to stop until you admit what a fraud you are.[/QUOTE]The longer the limbs, the more linear the body is likely to be. Of course, you didn't know this, because you were/are trying to learn what body linearity is, albeit in underhanded way of trying to pretend you are challenging me with a question, when you are really begging to get schooled. This is why the point made about the pygmies caught you off-guard, compelling you to protest without having the slightest clue about what you were protesting. [QUOTE]No need to dance around the issue, as those in the know are already aware of the fact that neither of Holiday's three visualizations of his multivariate analysis utilize or incorporate limb proportion indices; they are predicated on measurements (breadths, lengths and diameters, etc). Yes indeed, your posts smack of idiocy. Now, to get back on topic, how is the description below fig 5 consistent with the idea that it's depicting population relationships in limb proportions?[/QUOTE]You trying to cover up your lack of knowledge with a distracting question. How does one determine body shape without factoring in the limb proportions? I mean, I knew what I was talking about, when I conditioned about the "allusion" to "limb proportions"; there is no indication you know exactly why you protested, other than just to be disagreeable, so you can start pretending to look smart and call me wacky kindergarten-like names. [QUOTE]Face it, you thought you had the data behind you when you made the retarded insinuation that San limb proportions discredit fig 5, when the premise that insinuation is based on had been put to sleep by Holiday as early as 1999, and a host of other authors documenting that limb proportions don't have the last say in the matter.[/QUOTE]How does Holliday "put to rest", the finding of sub-tropical limb proportion index among the San? [QUOTE] That you laugh at the fact that this very ancient fact makes your comment obsolete is further evidence of the fact that you're a total fraud.[/QUOTE]So, me "laughing" at your [b]subsequent[/b] posts makes my earlier comment about San limb proportions "obsolete"? :D [QUOTE]Well, since you insist on trolling and lying, **prove** that the position of the Pygmy sample conformed to the following dictionary description of 'outlier' in the dendrograms that 2009 excerpt discusses. Perhaps you're better at gawking at dendrogram images than letters:[/QUOTE]I don't have to dumbass, because that is what the Holliday piece was essentially saying. Perhaps you should be busy learning what an outlier is, rather than reminding people of what an illiterate fool you are. [QUOTE]Troll, the Holiday 1997 piece I cited makes [i]direct[/i] references to commonalities between the North African sample and the Pygmy sample, which, according to Holiday, makes them cluster.[/QUOTE]This is still the dumbass red herring now as it was when you first posted it in response to a citation you couldn't understand. There is no indication that any more effort at making you understand will make you any less dumb...ever! [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3