...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Population Affinities of the Jebel Sahaba Skeletal Sample (Holliday 2013)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: You yourself have cited an exerpt stating that the Pygmy and the Nubian sample are ''less linear'', in spite of their clearly tropically adapted limbs, you phucking degenerate troll![/QUOTE]More evidence that fuckhead does not understand what body linearity is. The "less linear" body of the pygmies does not absolve them from a tropical body plan, dummy. [QUOTE] They have tropical limbs, which is not so much attested in their overal bodyplan. Note: they're both more tropically adapted that the Afalou sample in multivariate space, as seen in fig 5, yet, the Afalou sample is supposedly not an outlier sample according to the crack infested heap you call your brain?[/QUOTE]Nothing mentioned about the Afalou being an outlier or otherwise, fuckheaded gorilla; just your fat-ass' habit of chasing after the imaginery. [QUOTE]That's why your dumbass is the earth shattering buffoon that you are.[/QUOTE]You say something incredibly stupid, and then you figure someone else is a buffoon for what you said. [QUOTE] Here above, you admit that trunk measurements may not co-vary with limb proportions ''because they are not the same thing'', yet a few seconds prior to writing this self-assured post, your dumbass was bewildered by the suggestion that limb proportions may yield different results than the overall bodyplan.[/QUOTE]Your filthy butt obviously emits more nerve activity than your blockhead; one cannot admit to a concept that wasn't denied [i.e. trunk being different from limbs], but that confused you, numbnut. Secondly, the body plan factors in limb proportions, which your ass-head would know nothing about--as evidenced by repeated unfulfilled requests to show otherwise; trunk and limbs are not the same thing; try getting that hammered into your shithead. [QUOTE] The piece you're replying to talks about the fact that the IM clusters away from Sub-Saharan Africans in multivariate analysis[/QUOTE]Analysis which must not be speaking merely to limb proportions or body plan respectively, as other cited reports indicate. [QUOTE] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: You have been hell bent on saying that they only had affinities with Europeans, when in fact if anything ,it is both the [b]Mesolithic Maghrebi[/b] and UP Europeans [b]who would cluster with "Africans" before they did with Europeans in their average body plans[/b][/QUOTE]Prove it, liar![/QUOTE]No problem, fuckhead: Europeans generally have lower limb ratios and/or limb/trunk ratios than either the Mesolithic Maghrebi or the UP Europeans. You are so thick in that primitive skull, that you don't even recall your own quotes making this very clear. [QUOTE]Pointing out the fact that it doesn't mean much that IM have tropical limp proportions because most, if not all, Late Upper Palaeolihic Eurasian samples still did[/QUOTE]You must be suffering from on/off-switch amnesia. In the post just above, it would appear this fact had not ever crossed your poor resolution radar. [QUOTE]What claim it doesn't advance, is your insinuated claim that the IM limb proportions would have been any different in the scenario that they came out of Eurasia.[/QUOTE]numbnutted neanderthal, in fact it does [advance]. The Mesolithic Europeans, as your recitation says, had "shortened" limbs; by contrast, the Mesolithic Maghrebi, as indicated, feature long limbs. Apples and oranges, dumbass. [QUOTE] You're such a troll. You're being told again and again that this doesn't hold up for specimen whose limb ratios contrast with their overall bodyplan, because the former is still in a pleisiomorphic state.[/QUOTE]Explain how the "limb ratios contrast" with "their" overall body plan, and how this somehow renders limb proportions "a non-factor" in body linearity. The answer to this, will undoubtedly be another reminder of the kind of peerless idiot you are. [QUOTE]Besides, your dumbass used the IM limb proportions as a proxy for considering them ''linear''. [/QUOTE]fuckhead, it is not a "proxy"; it is a determinant. Learn the difference. [QUOTE] How did this work out for your dumbass, given the fact that the ''less linear'' Nubians and Pygmies used in this study are certainly more tropically adapted than the Afalou sample?[/QUOTE]It's working out just fine, given your post is just irrelevant shitheaded talk, which belies your charade of knowing what body linearity is. As for being "more tropically adapted than the Afalou sample", go ahead and tell away how that was [b]specifically[/b] determined. [QUOTE]That's what you were just schooled on, and, was totally unable to refute. Despite of your glaring inability to refute what I'm saying, you still choose to reiterate the same sentiment that was thrashed an exchange ago. The true mark of a megatroll: simply ignoring past thrashings and reposting the stuff that got you thrashed in the first place.[/QUOTE]I see you being such a queer Spongebob cry-baby panties above; not an iota about how body shape can be determined without consideration to limbs. Trying to give lessons on steep stupidity is not "schooling". [QUOTE]Another lie and manipulative distraction to get away from the fact that you can't refute that Holiday 1999 demonstrated that limb proportions don't predict bodyplan[/QUOTE]How does say, tropical limb proportions, not predict body plan. Have you come across "cold-adapted" body plans with tropical limb ratios or vice versa? [QUOTE] and that this exposes your horribly failed attempt to use San limb ratios as valid grounds to attempt to discredit fig 5, simply because it wasn't in agreement with the wishful emotion-based image you had of the Afalou.[/QUOTE]The so-called "attempt" cannot be deemed "failed", since it has neither been positively demonstrated that the San generally have a "tropical body plan", nor that recalled limb proportions are not so. You simply offered serial toothless whino-responses about the limb proportion reference being "obsolete", which you haven't been able to rationalize to date. [QUOTE]Lying out your ass. Other than what your emotion-based vested interests lead you to read into the excerpt, The Holiday piece said Pygmies and their Nubian sample were ''less linear'' relative to the other African groups, without any statement pertaining to the degree of the distance between what Holiday termed ''linear'' and ''less linear''.[/QUOTE]You are the only idiot on this planet who can mistake people schooling you on a simple excerpt for lying. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3