...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Population Affinities of the Jebel Sahaba Skeletal Sample (Holliday 2013)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] I'm noticing a pattern here. The more filthy dog explorer gets thrashed the sh!t out of him, the more his posts start to make less sense, ranging from non-reply rants to deliberate distortions, to pathological lies, with little to no relevant content in them. In short: everything BUT actual refutations of what I said. Not that it matters; the thrashings are there for everyone to see, whether the lying dog starts waving a white flag or whether the filthy dog acts as if his nose doesn't bleed. So yes, the below still stands, pending actual refutations, of course: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: The "less linear" body of the pygmies does not absolve them from a tropical body plan, dummy.[/QUOTE]Of course it does; in your sick interpretation of Holiday, re: ''Pygmies are outliers''. Lying troll. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Nothing mentioned about the Afalou being an outlier or otherwise, fuckheaded gorilla; just your fat-ass' habit of chasing after the imaginery.[/QUOTE]Of course your lying ass didn't; that was my entire point. Your inherently immoral lying ass nature prevents you from applying the same ''outlier'' status to the Afalou, that you did not hesitate to apply to the more tropically adapted Nubian and Pygmy sample. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: one cannot admit to a concept that wasn't denied [i.e. trunk being different from limbs], but that confused you, numbnut.[/QUOTE]Lying troll, you're not responding to the catastrophic predicament you're in; re: the inherent contradiction in your admission that trunk height may totally contradict limb proportions, which was bizarrely followed by what can only be described as bewildered emotion-based opposition to the idea that bodyplan may display the same pattern in relationship to limb proportions, as seen in the Nubian, Pygmy and Afalou. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Secondly, the body plan factors in limb proportions[/QUOTE]Another blatant lie, that I exposed as such earlier. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Analysis which must not be speaking merely to limb proportions or body plan respectively, as other cited reports indicate.[/QUOTE]See this people? This is what a pathologically lying troll looks like. This fraud still has to audacity to claim that fig 5 in the opening posts doesn't depict the Afalou among cold adapted samples in bodyplan. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Europeans generally have lower limb ratios and/or limb/trunk ratios than either the Mesolithic Maghrebi or the UP Europeans.[/QUOTE]Lying dog, neither of these evasive distractions prove what you initially claimed without a shred of evidence to back it up, re: '',it is both the [b]Mesolithic Maghrebi[/b] and UP Europeans who would cluster with "Africans" before they did with Europeans [b]in their average body plans[/b]''. Where is the evidence? [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: In the post just above, it would appear this fact had not ever crossed your poor resolution radar.[/QUOTE]Lying dog, what you wrote ''just above'' makes a worthless retarded claim pertaining to bodyplans, and doesn't even begin to address the inconvenient bummer that Ibero-Maurusian limb ratios would have been no different in the scenario that they came out of Eurasia, given the similar or even higher limb ratios in comparative Late Upper Palaeolithic Eurasian fossils. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: fuckhead, it is not a "proxy"; it is a determinant. Learn the difference.[/QUOTE]Lying dog, it has already been brought to your attention that tropical ratios in the case of Mesolithic Europeans weren't even determinative for absolute limb length, let alone body shape. I'm highly appreciative of your very generous supply of evidence, to me and the forum, that you have no idea what the phuck you're talking about. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: it's working out just fine, given your post is just irrelevant shitheaded talk, which belies your charade of knowing what body linearity is.[/QUOTE]This is just fake and empty accusing to make it seem like you have something to say. I was well aware enough of the definition to instantly call your invocation of ''linear in stature'' out for the crackpot mumbo jumbo that it is. Getting back on topic; specifically how does it work out for you that the Afalou are ''linear in stature'' (lol), when they cluster with ''less linear'' samples in fig 5? [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: As for being "more tropically adapted than the Afalou sample", go ahead and tell away how that was specifically determined.[/QUOTE]How about fig 5, posted in the opening post of this thread, troll. Is your senile dumbass asleep or something? SMH. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: not an iota about how body shape can be determined without consideration to limbs.[/QUOTE]Aside from the fact that your rehashed lie that ''body shape cannot be determined without limb data'' is just another example in a long line of fabrications on your part (Bergman's rule can be established independently of Allen's rule), you're also pathetically deluding yourself into believing that your not so subtle switch from your initial ''limb proportion'' to ''limbs'' is going unnoticed. Bottom line, you were already schooled on the fact that Holiday's multi-variate analysis is not predicated on limb ratios. You ignored this part if my posts, yet still go on to perpetuate this fat ass lie, like the lying dog that you are. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: How does say, tropical limb proportions, not predict body plan. Have you come across "cold-adapted" body plans with tropical limb ratios or vice versa?[/QUOTE]Dumbass troll, who has to be on crack to still not have realized by now that the Afalou sample is conforming to exactly what you're asking of me in fig 5 in the OP, have you ever bothered getting your neurone firing rate checked? You are slower than a sedated Sloth. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: The so-called "attempt" cannot be deemed "failed", since it has neither been positively demonstrated that the San generally have a "tropical body plan"[/QUOTE]Lying dumbass Sloth, I said that your attempt to use the said data as [b]valid grounds[/b] to do what you did in that unfortunate moment of profound obtuseness, failed. Big difference. Other than that, how would fig 5 not qualify as a demonstration that the San have a tropically adapted bodyplan, troll? [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: You are the only idiot on this planet who can mistake people schooling you on a simple excerpt for lying.[/QUOTE]No more evasive distractions; explain RIGHT NOW what crack-induced figment led you to conclude ''outliers'' were spoken of in Holiday's distinction between ''linear'' and ''less linear''?[/QUOTE][QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: Three more glaringly stupid claims led to the following investigations in your credibility, that you're running away from, ''Explorer''. You didn't think I wouldn't notice the fact that you chickened out of replying, did you? [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: I asked you a question, troll. No further stalling. What the hell is ''linear in stature''?[/QUOTE] [QUOTE] Originally posted by Swenet: Now, to get back on topic, how is the description below fig 5 consistent with the idea that it's depicting population relationships in limb proportions? [/QUOTE] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QUOTE] Originally posted by The Explorer: I have already gone through Trenton's "Body proportions of the Jebel Sahaba sample", but subsequently [b]lost the paper[/b] when my computer crashed earlier in the year.[/QUOTE]Please inform us about this paper you're referring to. What are the full specifics of the paper? Publication date, journal, etc.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3