...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
The Garamantes were not Berber speakers
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] Imazighen are the people speaking Tamazight. That is my definition. Before North Africans began to speak Tamazight lects they were not "Berbers." Garamantia is within "Berber" timeframes. Their scripted records will reveal if and when they utilized a Tamazight tongue. Kel Tamasheq ethno-genesis is post Garamantia. I haven't read any origin mythos by them that remembers anything like Garamantia a solid and extensive political state. I don't see Teda entering Fezzan any later than the Kels. I guess that map is as good as any. Does it jibe with other similar maps? There's some Xian missionary group very concerned with African ethnic groups. Maybe I'm simple to do it but I value their ethnic maps because the time they put in the field and the stakes they place in what they do. [IMG]http://www.joshuaproject.net/profiles/maps/m15316_ly.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.joshuaproject.net/profiles/maps/m15608.png[/IMG] I wish they did a Ghadames&Ghat Tuareg map but they don't and so [IMG]http://www.pictures2.temehu.com/p2/tuareg-confederacies-2.jpg[/IMG]. I also have no idea how much Libyan beduin are indigenous but [IMG]http://www.joshuaproject.net/profiles/maps/m11198_ly.png[/IMG] Qadhafi was beduin and his facial bone structure was sure not Arabian Arab. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3