...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
The Garamantes were not Berber speakers
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] My next few posts are all on the fly. Sorry but my time is fleeting and I haven't digested what I'm replying to -- will do so in full eventually. ===================== Why must all L lineages automatically be from slaves but Eurasian ones never from slaves? Some of the listed L is older than H1 and V. How do you know all central Saharan H1 an V is from Holocene Iberian mommies and none of it from Islamic era slaves? How do you know none of the central Saharan L is from Holocene East Africans? I don't know for a surety one way or the other but I take in all accounts without [i]a priori[/i] bias favoring either. They are all possibilities and I don't see one more probable than another. Bottomline Fezzani Kels mtDNA is 2/3rds Eurasian and 1/3rd African with some of the L much older than H1 and V. Some of the L even coalesces to the start of the Garamante kingdom. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3