...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient west Eurasian ancestry in southern and eastern Africa 2013
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Where does it say "tropical" in what you just quoted[/QUOTE]Trolling again. That your dumbass didn’t specifically mention ‘’tropical’’ doesn’t mean that I can’t hold it against you that your dumbass needed to be reminded of the no-brainer fact that the Ethiopian environment wherein such a selection would have taken place, is climatically tropical. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: what you are quoting [incompletely] there, is just me telling you what the paper actually notes about the SLC24A5 allele[/QUOTE]Trolling again. The paper doesn't say that the authors identify ''skin pigmentation as the likely phenotypic candidate of this selection''. It's your interpretation of what they're saying, and, as such, it was your dumbass who made the retarded claim that light skin was selected for in a region which, apparently unbeknownst to your dumb ass, is equatorial. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: I thought I already clued in your stupid monkey ass that if there were no other skin pigmentation genes in Ethiopians[/QUOTE]You’re such a phuckin’ low IQ, dumbass, charlatan. Is your bum ass saying that the Ethiopian sample implicated here wouldn’t have had additional skin pigmentation genes, had, let’s say, derived SLC45A2 been found in them? Get to work, fraud: [i]If not negative selection, explain why no other skin pigmentation genes were found in the Ethiopian population[/i] --Swenet [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: the correct gene; you can't even get the gene right[/QUOTE]Hey, it’s not my fault you’re bewildered about the fact that they tested for SLC45A2 and came up short. That you don’t know this is further evidence that you’re way out of your league here. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: they would neither be "looking for" nor applying Z-scores [/QUOTE]LMAO. **Where** did they ''apply Z-scores’’ when they attempted to track down the other skin pigmentation genes? You’re such a phuckin’ crackhead. Judging by past discussions where you kept running away from your blunders, you will now stop responding to this, no matter how many times I press you to back this piece of sh!t claim up. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: notice it's not "looked for", douchebag[/QUOTE]This, too, shows how patently stupid you are. As a matter of fact, I’m beginning to suspect that you have the reading comprehension of Ray Charles. Of course they ’’looked at’’ the literature first to identify which genes they should be looking ‘’for’’ in the Ethiopian populations. Only a brainless troll such as yourself would use it against another poster that the authors state that they consulted the literature. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: dumbass chump, they have different bio-histories[/QUOTE]Your spacey attempt to wilfully wish these facts away with some random mumbo jumbo blank no-brainer invocation of ’’differing bio-histories’’ is at odds with the fact that I’ve just told your dumbass that the levels of derived SLC24A5 in Ethiopia match the amount of Syria affinity having haplotypes in the respective local populations. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: the authors had already decided upon which sequences to treat "African" and "non-African", henceforth why the study was fucked up.[/QUOTE]Ah, let me guess, this is where your lie comes in that the discernment of African vs non-African was ’’mostly left to the imagination of the reader’’, right? Your dogmatic troll inclinations are obstructing your bias stricken eyeballs from seeing the readily observable fact that Pagani et al’s methods are vindicated by the fact that the Omotic speakers, whose African haplotypes differ from other Ethiopians only in terms of component proportion (i.e. not in terms of component type), yet, they had little trouble coming out as biologically almost exclusively African. Of course, their comparatively low level of SLC24A5, their comparatively lower amount of non-African uniparentals, their comparatively lower amount of Ethio-Semitic loanwords and comparatively larger distance from the ancient urban localities that would have attracted populations with these Syrian affinity having haplotypes you're lamenting (but can't do sh!t about), have nothing to do with each other; it’s all just a coincidental happenstance that these independent phenomena happen to date to 3kya and come together to form a coherent multi-disciplinary case. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Go ahead and ask many more times, [b]the answer doesn't change[/b][/QUOTE]Of course it won’t, and the reason is none other than the fact that you can’t answer it without inserting girly giggle accompanied unsubstantiated claims that the Sri Lankan skin pigmentation state of affairs bolsters your non-existent case! For the fourth time it’s observed that you’re scared sh!tless to address what is being shoved in your face, with more than tail between legs amygdala triggered non-replies: [i]Lying ass troll, the Sri Lankan samples had an excess of SLC24A5, and a severe deficit of SLC45A2. Explain this under your crackpot theory that a severe minority of SLC24A5 correlated genes testify to an indigenous origin of this gene.[/i] --Swenet [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3