...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient west Eurasian ancestry in southern and eastern Africa 2013
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: A plain text stumped your monkey ass, and you think some one else is dumb[/QUOTE]Your lying ass was caught red handed making the retarded statement that derived SLC24A5 was selected for in a tropical environment, right here: [i]To the contrary, the paper only identifies skin pigmentation as the likely phenotypic candidate of this selection.[/i]--The Explorer No amount of creative replying is going to fix that. You can either defend that pre-defeated claim or take another loss. it's up to you. [QUOTE]The paper identifies skin pigmentation as phenotypic trait of the allele, not once but several times over.[/QUOTE]You’re now getting caught red-handed lying that the contention is about whether the gene is associated with light skin. Troll, you were tasked with backing your piece of sh!t claim up that this phenotype was specifically selected for in Sub-Sahara Africa, not with citing what so far has been found to be an expression of derived SLC24A5. [QUOTE]The section cited mentions nothing about SLC45A2[/QUOTE]Your filthy lying ass is clearly in need of schooling on the fact that SLC45A2 was referred to, among other genes, when they said ’’other genes associated with pigmentation in Europe’’. [QUOTE]Where do you see, ’’looked at’’ the literature first to identify which genes they should be looking ‘’for’’" in this[/QUOTE]Of course it’s not in that citation after your pathologically lying, bummy ass doctored it, thinking your manipulations would go unnoticed. The quote without your deliberate distortions: [i]To further investigate the effect of admixture on the genetic landscape of skin pigmentation in Ethiopia, we also looked at other genes associated with pigmentation in Europe; [/i][b]46[/b][i] [***footnote***] however, none were found in our outlier regions.[/i] --Pagani et al [QUOTE]You needed to be fed like a helpless baby with this "no-brainer"[/QUOTE]Back to running away from the inconvenient facts that are being shoved down your throat, eh? These facts are staring you in the face, and there is nothing you’re going to do about them, other than masking your inability to adress them with keyboard warrior macho-talk, like the pathetic b!tch that you are: [i]Your spacey attempt to wilfully wish these facts away with some random mumbo jumbo blank no-brainer invocation of ’’differing bio-histories’’ is at odds with the fact that I’ve just told your dumbass that the levels of derived SLC24A5 in Ethiopia match the amount of Syria affinity having haplotypes in the respective local populations.[/i] --Swenet [QUOTE]That's just what you do: guessing.[/QUOTE]Yes, citing sections of my posts that don't even contain arguments and thinking of creative ways to make off-topic comments is what you do when imminent thrashing is staring you in the face. How about actually addressing these facts, which you've gone to great lengths to seek refuge from: [QUOTE]your dogmatic troll inclinations are obstructing your bias stricken eyeballs from seeing the readily observable fact that Pagani et al’s methods are vindicated by the fact that the Omotic speakers, whose African haplotypes differ from other Ethiopians only in terms of component proportion (i.e. not in terms of component type), yet, they had little trouble coming out as biologically almost exclusively African. Of course, their comparatively low level of SLC24A5, their comparatively lower amount of non-African uniparentals, their comparatively lower amount of Ethio-Semitic loanwords and comparatively larger distance from the ancient urban localities that would have attracted populations with these Syrian affinity having haplotypes you're lamenting (but can't do sh!t about), have nothing to do with each other; it’s all just a coincidental happenstance that these independent phenomena happen to date to 3kya and come together to form a coherent multi-disciplinary case.[/QUOTE]When you’ve mustered up the balls to do so, try tackling the following inconvenient facts as well, will ya? I have more ass whooping in store for your lying ass: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Go ahead and ask many more times, [b]the answer doesn't change[/b][/QUOTE]Of course it won’t, and the reason is none other than the fact that you can’t answer it without inserting girly giggle accompanied unsubstantiated claims that the Sri Lankan skin pigmentation state of affairs bolsters your non-existent case! For the fourth time it’s observed that you’re scared sh!tless to address what is being shoved in your face, with more than tail between legs amygdala triggered non-replies: [i]Lying ass troll, the Sri Lankan samples had an excess of SLC24A5, and a severe deficit of SLC45A2. Explain this under your crackpot theory that a severe minority of SLC24A5 correlated genes testify to an indigenous origin of this gene.[/i] --Swenet[/QUOTE]Just thought I’d ’remind’ you that you ran away from this, here, too: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: I thought I already clued in your stupid monkey ass that if there were no other skin pigmentation genes in Ethiopians[/QUOTE]You’re such a phuckin’ low IQ, dumbass, charlatan. Is your bum ass saying that the Ethiopian sample implicated here wouldn’t have had additional skin pigmentation genes, had, let’s say, derived SLC45A2 been found in them? Get to work, fraud: [i]If not negative selection, explain why no other skin pigmentation genes were found in the Ethiopian population[/i] --Swenet[/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3