...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient west Eurasian ancestry in southern and eastern Africa 2013
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Cite the text (Pagani et al. 2012) that mentions "SLC45A2", fuckhead monkey.[/QUOTE]You now realize that you phucked up when your glaring obliviousness to the matters being discussed led you to confuse my mention of SLC45A2 for a mistaken identity with SLC24A5 on my part. In a desperate bid to safe face and hide your glaring blunder, you're now moving the goal post to whether SLC45A2 was singled out and specifically articulated in Pagani's text. Filthy lying ass pig, didn't I tell your filthy ass to stop lying so much? [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: You've confused Pagani et al.'s application of "looked at" in the text for this self-interjected moronic substitution[/QUOTE]Lying ass pig, they referenced a 2009 paper which has a section dedicated to the exact same pigmentation genes that were of interest to Pagani et al. Do your struggling neurones imagine the footnote is sitting there for decoration purposes? What is it doing there if not serving as a reference to point their readership to the genes they themselves had the samples tested for? Speak up, troll! [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: There's no point in citing useless "sections" of your post stuffed with fairy tale gibberish[/QUOTE]Filthy lying ass pig, your structural angst of addressing what you're referring to as ''fairy tales'' speaks louder than your wimpy, all by your lonesome, protestations. two invitations, pig. Two invitations were extended to you, and both of them were met with angst driven avoidance and subsequent toothless tough talk. This is the third invitation to back your piece of sh!t claim up: [QUOTE]your dogmatic troll inclinations are obstructing your bias stricken eyeballs from seeing the readily observable fact that Pagani et al’s methods are vindicated by the fact that the Omotic speakers, whose African haplotypes differ from other Ethiopians only in terms of component proportion (i.e. not in terms of component type), yet, they had little trouble coming out as biologically almost exclusively African. Of course, their comparatively low level of SLC24A5, their comparatively lower amount of non-African uniparentals, their comparatively lower amount of Ethio-Semitic loanwords and comparatively larger distance from the ancient urban localities that would have attracted populations with these Syrian affinity having haplotypes you're lamenting (but can't do sh!t about), have nothing to do with each other; it’s all just a coincidental happenstance that these independent phenomena happen to date to 3kya and come together to form a coherent multi-disciplinary case.[/QUOTE]--Swenet [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: "caught red handed" in this piece, in which "derived SLC24A5 was selected for in a tropical environment" is nowhere to be found outside of your stunted head[/QUOTE]...and then the lying ass troll goes on to re-confirm its shaky interpretation that Pagani state that SLC24A5 got selected in the Ethiopian Cushitic-Semitic speakers because of its light skin associated features. You're stumped by 1) the fact that the implied populations are living in highly inconducive intense UV environments 2) that there are no traces of other pigmentation genes in Semitic-Cushitic speakers (despite their inferred ancient presence) and 3) that derived SLC24A5 in the other Ethiopian populations did not undergo selection. When you’ve mustered up the balls to do so, try tackling the following inconvenient facts as well, will ya? I have more ass whooping in store for your lying ass: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Go ahead and ask many more times, [b]the answer doesn't change[/b][/QUOTE]Of course it won’t, and the reason is none other than the fact that you can’t answer it without inserting girly giggle accompanied unsubstantiated claims that the Sri Lankan skin pigmentation state of affairs bolsters your non-existent case! For the fourth time it’s observed that you’re scared sh!tless to address what is being shoved in your face, with more than tail between legs amygdala triggered non-replies: [i]Lying ass troll, the Sri Lankan samples had an excess of SLC24A5, and a severe deficit of SLC45A2. Explain this under your crackpot theory that a severe minority of SLC24A5 correlated genes testify to an indigenous origin of this gene.[/i] --Swenet[/QUOTE]Just thought I’d ’remind’ you that you ran away from this, here, too: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: I thought I already clued in your stupid monkey ass that if there were no other skin pigmentation genes in Ethiopians[/QUOTE]You’re such a phuckin’ low IQ, dumbass, charlatan. Is your bum ass saying that the Ethiopian sample implicated here wouldn’t have had additional skin pigmentation genes, had, let’s say, derived SLC45A2 been found in them? Get to work, fraud: [i]If not negative selection, explain why no other skin pigmentation genes were found in the Ethiopian population[/i] --Swenet[/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3