...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient west Eurasian ancestry in southern and eastern Africa 2013
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Ok, Pagani et al.'s text does not mention SLC45A2 at all.[/QUOTE]Like the sick troll that you are, you're now structurally lying your way out of your phuckups. Filty lying ass pig, cite where I said that Pagani et al mention SLC45A2 explicitly in their text, rather than simply having identified it as one of the genes implicated in what they meant when they said ''we also looked at [b]other genes[/b] associated with pigmentation in Europe''. While you're at it, explain how your persistent trolling in regards to this tenacious lie of yours, rectifies your earlier fabricated lie that my mention of the gene was an accident. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: As such, when the authors noted "looked at" the other genes, they simply meant that they took them (other genes) [b]into consideration[/b][/QUOTE]Cognitively challenged lying ass troll, how is the highlighted inconsistent with what I said, namely, that the authors consulted the aforementioned source? What would have preceded this ''taking into consideration'', if not getting updated on prospect genes, which they could then test their samples for? [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: but in any event, saying that "SLC24A5 got selected in the Ethiopian Cushitic-Semitic speakers" is not the same thing as "derived SLC24A5 was selected for in a tropical environment", now is it?[/QUOTE]Unless these people aren't actually tropical populations, it isn't going to matter whether you explicitly said they were equatorial, you phuchin' jackass. You said skin pigmentation is a ''likely phenotypic candidate of this selection'' (end quote) in populations who reside at an equatorial lattitude. [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: And again, just quotes, no misinformed paraphrase[/QUOTE]You're now asking me to [i]quote[/i] where you were stumped? You're such a cognitively impaired sack of sh!t, LMAO. How is someone supposed to quote a non-verbal state of mind (being stumped), you filthy dumbass pig? Then again, making such braindead logically impracticable requests is right up your alley, recalling earlier crackhead requests you made, such as ''cite the accuracies in Kefi 2005''. Explain the following specifics under your crackpot view that derived SLC24A5 got selected for in the sampled Cushitic-Semitic speakers due to its light skin associated expression: [i]You're stumped by 1) the fact that the implied populations are living in highly inconducive intense UV environments 2) that there are no traces of other pigmentation genes in Semitic- Cushitic speakers (despite their inferred ancient presence) and 3) that derived SLC24A5 in the other Ethiopian populations did not undergo selection.[/i] --Swenet When you’ve mustered up the balls to do so, try tackling the following inconvenient facts as well, will ya? I have more ass whooping in store for your lying ass: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Go ahead and ask many more times, [b]the answer doesn't change[/b][/QUOTE]Of course it won’t, and the reason is none other than the fact that you can’t answer it without inserting girly giggle accompanied unsubstantiated claims that the Sri Lankan skin pigmentation state of affairs bolsters your non-existent case! For the fourth time it’s observed that you’re scared sh!tless to address what is being shoved in your face, with more than tail between legs amygdala triggered non-replies: [i]Lying ass troll, the Sri Lankan samples had an excess of SLC24A5, and a severe deficit of SLC45A2. Explain this under your crackpot theory that a severe minority of SLC24A5 correlated genes testify to an indigenous origin of this gene.[/i] --Swenet[/QUOTE]Just thought I’d ’remind’ you that you ran away from this, here, too: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: I thought I already clued in your stupid monkey ass that if there were no other skin pigmentation genes in Ethiopians[/QUOTE]You’re such a phuckin’ low IQ, dumbass, charlatan. Is your bum ass saying that the Ethiopian sample implicated here wouldn’t have had additional skin pigmentation genes, had, let’s say, derived SLC45A2 been found in them? Get to work, fraud: [i]If not negative selection, explain why no other skin pigmentation genes were found in the Ethiopian population[/i] --Swenet[/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3