...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient west Eurasian ancestry in southern and eastern Africa 2013
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] I'm on yo ass, boy! [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: [b]SLC45A2 was not mentioned in the text[/b] you want to wish it in, that's how irrelevant it is.[/QUOTE]Lying ass fraud, you're quite uncreative with your repetitive, shaky-legged, amygdala triggered non- replies to my very simple question: [i]how is the paper associated with citation number 46 (and the skin pigmentation genes mentioned therein), not the focal point of what Pagani et al mean when they say ''other genes''?[/i] --Swenet[/QUOTE][IMG]http://www.galleryone.com/images/rockwell/rockwell-fleeing-hobo.jpg[/IMG] If your balls didn't desert you, like they did the past hundred times you were asked to address the above, you can take a stab at addressing these inconvenient dumpers, that you dogmatically failed to take into account: [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: See above: initial selection in the sub-tropical region of the Sahara.[/QUOTE]The admixture event dates to 3kya. You're not going to wish this admixture event away by assigning Ethiopians a fabricated origin in the Sahara. The Syria-like genetic component would still have to become an important genetic contribution, even within your shitty scenario. Not to mention, the hard to swallow pill that this component has an obvious connection to derived SLC24A5 in Ethiopians, also seems to have slipped through the gaping holes of your ''Sahara'' figment. Other than that, I sure would like to see the pre-defeated piece of evidence that warrants this misty ''Sahara'' scenario, where the sampled Cushitic-Speakers are somehow not the descendants of Axum era equatorial populations, but of some Northern entity that's solely the product of your rabid imagination. Moreover, how does selection on the derived gene in Ethiopians qualify as a remnant of some imaginary proto population in the Sahara, when the other Ethiopians (Omotic speakers), who derive from the exact same ancestral populations (they only vary from Cushitic-Semitic speakers in their amount of Syrian-like ancestry), don't have excesses of the derived gene? It would also be nice to see the ecological specifics you've gathered before you went public with that claptrap theory, so as to make sure you wouldn't be making a complete ass out of yourself, by suggesting that light skin is advantageous in the Sahara. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3