...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
My take on the possibility of Abu Bakr II reaching the Americas
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] You continue to overlook my questions. Until you answer them I will ignore anything you ask me in any ES thread. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [qb] I gave my methodology for deducing identity. You asked to show any pro saying the veiled black camel rider in de Viladestes represents the al~Murabitun amir abu Bakr a Lemtuna. So why is it good when it comes from others but my deduction and presentation nonsense? Why are they acceptable without a scrap of their methodology even presented? Why is it no longer nonsense? A game of Simon Sez where it only counts if Simon says so (even though Simon puts up no "proofs") But it's nonsense when my black ass says it despite presenting backing reasons? Even some unknown person's word is more valuable, eh? [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3