...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Hamiticentric Critique (and a letter) to DNATribes Amarna 2010-2013
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Truthcentric: [QB] The contamination charge is ridiculous. Most of the people working on Tut, Ramses III, and the rest would have either been European or modern Egyptian, not sub-Saharan African or Afro-Diaspora. I tried using that DNA-Fingerprint program (I presume it was Amatch?) Noah mentioned in his last post, and so far I'm not even sure how to enter in the Amarna data. If you notice, each STR listed in the JAMA paper has two values (e.g. CSF1PO has 6 and 12) , but the Amatch program only gives you one text field per locus. Additionally, does anyone know if DNA Tribes has Upper Egyptians in their database? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3