...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Hamiticentric Critique (and a letter) to DNATribes Amarna 2010-2013
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Truthcentric: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Amun-Ra The Ultimate: [qb]Defending it and not liking the results (and try to make them say something else) are not the same thing!! Since they know they can't attack the DNA Tribes results directly. They adopt a different strategy. They simply try to twist their meaning to make them means something else than what the results show directly. [/qb][/QUOTE]And what would that be? I have observed your insistence that these results show that African people are all closely related, but I am not sure if this is the correct interpretation. My understanding is that African populations all have a lot of genetic diversity and that Eurasians and the rest represent only a narrow subset of that. All the DNA Tribes analysis shows is that the tested mummies fall outside the narrow non-African clade. That would indeed make them African from a phylogenetic view, but that would only mean that they are not non-African, not necessarily that the rest are all close kin. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3