...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Hamiticentric Critique (and a letter) to DNATribes Amarna 2010-2013
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] I wish you guys will get it straight. DNATribes did NOT perform the "study" on the Amarnas. Hawass and his buddies did. ie JAMA. What DNATribes did was take the freely available published data from the JAMA report and plug it into their "extensive" database to come up with a most likely match(MLI). The comparision shows that the closest match is South African, Great Lakes and West African in that order. All SSA. ANYONE can do the same thing. There is a lot of available software out there that can do the same thing. Even anyone of you. The information was pissing in our face for over two years before DNATribes said "hey guys...". In most cases only 2-3 str values are needed for a priliminary geographic placement. Hawass disclosed eight(8) str!!. Yeah contamination maybe an issue but ALL eight mummies were SSA STR. Contamination is unlikely. Also keep in mind a family tree was established. So unless the aunt, uncle, sister, great aunt touched the mummies would you please stop the SSA contamination nonsense. lol! Use your fughking head and think!! [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3