...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Hamiticentric Critique (and a letter) to DNATribes Amarna 2010-2013
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] Nice ... get us back on track. At least we agree it had nothing to do with Islamic expansion. We can discuss its origin in another thread. Or just read my post on ESR . [/qb][/QUOTE]that article argues near eastern origin for J1, M43 and M78 that expanded from there into other parts of Arabian penninsula and across the Sahara The article does not deny that J1 was further spread into North Africa during the Islamic period by traders from Arabia who intermarried-and by other Arab prior to Islam There is no denying that, according to the article it also had prior near east origin so you cant attribute to only the Arabs, including Anatolia and Caucus regions. In other words that article is not an argument for African origin of J1 [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3