...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Hamiticentric Critique (and a letter) to DNATribes Amarna 2010-2013
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Amun-Ra The Ultimate: [QB] The Y-DNA haplogroups situation is really simple: [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3d/Y-DNA_tree.GIF[/IMG] ABE=African DCF=non-African Obviously since the main OOA migration of non-African there's been some level of admixtures between humans who stayed in Africa and humans who left Africa(F descendants mostly). For example, some Cameroonians got the R haplogroup. R haplogroup in Africa is an example of the back migration of F descendants in Africa after many millennium of separation. R is an haplogroup descendant of the F haplogroup along with other haplogroup like R,H,I,J,K. Still in this case, it's most probable that if autosomal DNA were analyzed the full genome of those Cameroonians would be mostly African despite possessing a non-African haplogroup. Since Y-DNA and MtDNA haplogroups are only one line of descent. Same thing with ancient E or mtDNA L haplogroup found in Europe. In this case, even if some "native" Europeans got the E and mtDNA L haplogroup, before and around 10 000BC, their full genome is probably mostly Europeans. The mtDNA situation is similarly simple. L and possibly M1=African non-L=non-African [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3