...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Hamiticentric Critique (and a letter) to DNATribes Amarna 2010-2013
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Amun-Ra The Ultimate: [QB] While the lioness, and Mike provide us with distractions, it has nothing to do with the Hamiticentric critique or the DNA Tribes results. According to the DNA Tribes results of the 18th Dynasty and 20th Dynasty mummies. Ancient Egyptian are genetically closer to modern Great Lakes, Southern and West Africans. Not modern Levantine, North African or West Asian populations. The BMJ study also demonstrate that Ramses III is E1b1a/E-M2, which is an haplogroup prevalent all over Africa and rare in other regions. That's the hard facts we got at the moment. Personally, while speculative, I also think with the right population samples, and a different set of mummies, East Africans would also be close to Ancient Egyptians. And those East Africans would be close to other Africans (Great Lakes,Western, etc). In fact, those East Africans would be as close to Ancient Egyptians as they are close to other African population groups, only tempered by the degree of "recent" foreign admixtures. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3