...
EgyptSearch Forums Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» EgyptSearch Forums » Egyptology » Genome-wide scan of 29,141 African Americans finds no evidence of selection since adm » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
the lioness,
Member # 17353
 - posted
Genome-wide scan of 29,141 African Americans finds no evidence of selection since admixture

Gaurav Bhatia et al.

We scanned through the genomes of 29,141 African Americans, searching for loci where the average proportion of African ancestry deviates significantly from the genome-wide average. We failed to find any genome-wide significant deviations, and conclude that any selection in African Americans since admixture is sufficiently weak that it falls below the threshold of our power to detect it using a large sample size. These results stand in contrast to the findings of a recent study of selection in African Americans. That study, which had 15 times fewer samples, reported six loci with significant deviations. We show that the discrepancy is likely due to insufficient correction for multiple hypothesis testing in the previous study. The same study reported 14 loci that showed greater population differentiation between African Americans and Nigerian Yoruba than would be expected in the absence of natural selection. Four such loci were previously shown to be genome-wide significant and likely to be affected by selection, but we show that most of the 10 additional loci are likely to be false positives. Additionally, the most parsimonious explanation for the loci that have significant evidence of unusual differentiation in frequency between Nigerians and Africans Americans is selection in Africa prior to their forced migration to the Americas.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.2675v1.pdf
 
Swenet
Member # 17303
 - posted
Why not post a link to Dienekes, you know, the site
you ripped it from? Or is it your intention to make
it seem like you tracked down the papers you've
been posting lately, yourself?
 
the lioness,
Member # 17353
 - posted
quote:
Originally posted by Swenet:
Why not post a link to Dienekes, you know, the site
you ripped it from? Or is it your intention to make
it seem like you tracked down the papers you've
been posting lately, yourself?

Fvck Dienekes, I don't have to give him credit he didn't write the article

I can't believe you're worried about him getting some sort of credit.

He posts a lot of new articles. I suppose your theory is if he posts them they must be bad.

-let me know when you address the content of the article

now go back to facebook, you're supposed to be boycotting lionessearch
 



Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3