...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Reconstructions by Elisabeth Daynès, how and why?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] ^ Explorer explained it best [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: Here the Afalou cannot supposedly be considered as being either Negro or San, but according to Grove's factor analysis,... the Afalou specimens reported negatively on factor 2, **which is supposed to represent [i]"Sub-Saharan/Caucasoid contrast"[/i]**, Lol. Presumably according to this factor analysis, those specimens that reported 'positively' on factor 2, were in the "caucasoid" camp, while those that reported 'negatively', were in the "sub-Saharan" camp. And so, it also follows, interestingly, that Groves' [b]Dogon male specimen would qualify as a "caucasoid", even if supposedly to a relatively lesser degree than his Taforalt and Cro-Magnon specimens for example.[/b] Interestingly though, Groves preferred to refer to his Dogon and Afalou specimens as being "intermediate". But we all know about Grove's reactionary "racial" concepts, don't we. :) [/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3