...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Cavalli-Sforza's infamous statement
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] Cavalli Sforza: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_history_of_Europe ^Better make screen shots while you still can, before the Wiki trolls discover this page and wipe out all the info that's damning to their little narrative of racial purity. For more analogous data, see text and link: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QUOTE]Originally posted by alTakruri: Yes I once posted a chart exampling that deep rooting's not necessarily indicative of overall genome. It showed the scenario where a Black American could by haplogroup be a mustee (American for mestizo) of 4th generation direct Skins maternity and 4th generation direct Euro paternity. All his 14 other 4th generation African ancestry only shows in recombinational autosomes. Overall they make him what he is.[/QUOTE]Right. When non-African is defined as: "Ancestry that arrived in Eurasia AFTER the OOA populations left Africa" Instead of: "Everything that doesn't resemble the ancestry carried by West and Central African proxy samples" You can get analysis that looks like this, where north Africans are more or less 50% African, and West Eurasians ~25-47% African: http://ethiohelix.blogspot.nl/2012/07/world-at-k2.html So, why aren't researchers universally adopting this much more scientifically accurate method? Why do they KNOWINGLY keep using dubious proxy samples to define what constitutes African ancestry when they can use straight forward cut off points to distinguish between African and non-African ancestry? They know this cannot be viable because they themselves admit there was sub-structure in deep time in n.Africa and e.Africa before and after OOA, which may have never reached the African interior, but which is African nonetheless. [/qb][/QUOTE]As well as this: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QUOTE]Estimates of divergence times between European–African and East Asian–African populations are inconsistent with its simplest manifestation: a single dispersal from the continent followed by a split into Western and Eastern Eurasian branches. Rather, population divergence times are consistent with [b]substantial ancient gene flow to the proto-European population after its divergence with proto-East Asians, suggesting distinct, early dispersals of modern H. sapiens from Africa.[/b][/QUOTE][URL=http://genome.cshlp.org/content/early/2011/04/25/gr.119636.110.full.pdf+html]Link[/URL] "Proto-European" here INCLUDES West Asia BTW. [/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3