...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Early Back-to-Africa Migration into the Horn of Africa, Hodgson, 2014
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Son of Ra: [QB] So let me understand... the arguments on here is that Amun-Ra The Ultimate thinks that since Africans liken Ethiopians are closer to Eurasians that those types of Africans are admixed? If that's the case then he is incorrect. Eurasians only [b]descend[/b] from a small pocket of Africans(East Africans): [IMG]http://i58.tinypic.com/2m4r37q.jpg[/IMG] [QUOTE] [b]The fact that the Ethiopians and Somalis have a subset of the sub-Saharan African haplotype diversity—and that the non-African populations have a subset of the diversity present in Ethiopians and Somalis—makes simple-admixture models less likely;[/b] rather, these observations support the hypothesis proposed by other nuclear-genetic studies (Tishkoff et al. 1996a, 1998a, 1998b; Kidd et al. 1998)—that populations in northeastern Africa may have diverged from those in the rest of sub-Saharan Africa early in the history of modern African populations and [b]that a subset of this northeastern-African population migrated out of Africa and populated the rest of the globe.[/b] [/QUOTE] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1287905/ Again doesn't mean East Africans are heavily mixed, but that Eurasians descend from those SPECIFIC Africans. And thus East Africans are closer to Eurasians than any other Afrcian. Duh! This is the same thing with the Greeks: [QUOTE]HLA alleles have been determined in individuals from the Republic of Macedonia by DNA typing and sequencing. HLA-A, -B, -DR, -DQ allele frequencies and extended haplotypes have been for the first time determined and the results compared to those of other Mediterraneans, particularly with their neighbouring Greeks. Genetic distances, neighbor-joining dendrograms and correspondence analysis have been performed. The following conclusions have been reached: 1) [b]Macedonians belong to the "older" Mediterranean substratum[B], like Iberians (including Basques), North Africans, Italians, French, Cretans, Jews, Lebanese, Turks (Anatolians), Armenians and Iranians, 2) Macedonians are not related with geographically close Greeks, who do not belong to the "older" Mediterranenan substratum, 3) [B]Greeks are found to have a substantial relatedness to sub-Saharan (Ethiopian) people, which separate them from other Mediterranean groups. Both Greeks and Ethiopians share quasi-specific DRB1 alleles, such as *0305, *0307, *0411, *0413, *0416, *0417, *0420, *1110, *1112, *1304 and *1310. Genetic distances are closer between Greeks and Ethiopian/sub-Saharan groups than to any other Mediterranean group and finally Greeks cluster with Ethiopians/sub-Saharans in both neighbour joining dendrograms and correspondence analyses.[/b] The time period when these relationships might have occurred was ancient but uncertain and might be related to the displacement of Egyptian-Ethiopian people living in pharaonic Egypt. [/QUOTE] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11260506 When it comes to [b]genetic distance[/b] Greeks are closer to Africans than any other European group, but they are still indigenous Europeans. Djehuti mentioned that there were multiple OOA's. Not only that we know like India; Europe was populated many time throughout time. Could Greeks be descendant of migrating Northeast Africans into Western Asia and then Southeast Europe? I mean they carry mutated E-V13 in high frequencies. Along with Benin sickle cell haplotype. Not saying modern Greeks are African of course. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3