...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Early Back-to-Africa Migration into the Horn of Africa, Hodgson, 2014
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Amun-Ra The Ultimate: For example, Yoruba got 45.45% of L3, while Somali 44.68% of L3. Yoruba L3 45.45% (12.12+6.06+21.21+6.06) Somali L3 44.68% (7.41+3.74+7.47+11.11+3.74+3.74+7.47) [/QUOTE]As I told you several days ago, your math is as obtuse as half of your posts here. 1) you didn't reduce the Somali mtDNA pool to L types before you started counting their ratio of L3 against their mtDNA pool--which you did for the Yorubans. Had your incompetent dumbass done this, you would have arrived at 60% L3 types in the Somali mtDNA L pool, not 44.68%. 2) you forgot to mention that the lack of endemic East African lineages like L4, L5 and L6 and the presence of local West/Central African L2 and L1 types in Yorubans doesn't jibe with your wacky fairy tale of the Yoruba population being wholesale colonists from East Africa in some recent epoch. 3) you forgot to demonstrate that the frequency of L3b, L3e and L3d in West/Central Africans is reflective of the magnitude of the genetic contribution from Upper Palaeolithic East Africa that coincides with the introduction of L3e, L3b and L3d to the Yoruban mtDNA pool. Prove this didn't inflate through sexual selection or founder effect. Did you account for this, troll? Do you even know how to account for this, troll? Of course you don't. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3