...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
beyoku asks: Which population is the most genetically distinct from Sub Saharans?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Troll Patrol # Ish Gebor: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Troll Patrol # Ish Gebor: [qb] It seems you're avoiding the above. LOL [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] ^^^ more and more charts and data avoiding which population is the most genetically distinct from Sub Saharans? [/qb][/QUOTE]Ps, the oldest sub Sharan African branch is most genetically distinct from the most recent Eurasians. Marinate on that one. [/qb][/QUOTE]I'm not sure you are correct on this wouldn't the most recent Eurasians be the ones who left Africa the latest? It seems of Eurasians the most recent Eurasians would be closer to Africans having not been out of Africa as long as the older, least recent Eurasians To clearify name the Eurasian group, let's not keep it a secret [/qb][/QUOTE]I don't know of a specific name/ branch, and I don't see the importance in it anyway. But logic tells that the oldest African populations (with the oldest "SNP's") are least likely to cluster with younger (youngest) Eurasian populations (who have much younger mutations) Thus are most distant. But, let's be clear, you are even too stupid to look up SNP's inheritance or understand a split region. How are you then going to say, "your not sure about it"? That doesn't make any sense. [IMG]http://www.freemathhelp.com/images/lessons/xy1.png[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3