...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
DNA Tribes A Genetic Component: First Farmers (EEF) in the Middle East and Europe
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [IMG]http://i61.tinypic.com/2iktpgg.jpg[/IMG] Maybe I shouldn't put up these DNA Tribes charts anymore. They lead to a lot of confusion, I fault DNA tribes xyyman says Arabia is an extension of Africa due to this chart When you look at the Arabia line it says 26.1% Horn of Africa 30.3% North Africa Add that up xyyman says Arabs are 56.4% African, therfore Arabia is an extension of Africa The problem is when we look at these conponents each one is not all African, example the Horn: [URL=http://www.ephotobay.com/share/picture-27-138.html] [IMG]http://www.ephotobay.com/image/picture-27-138.png[/IMG][/URL] ^ So here they say the Horn is 42.3% African But that means when they are saying that Arabia is 26.1% Horn of Africa that 26.1% is not all African only 42.3% of it is Similarly with DNA Tribes heading "North Africa" According to DNA Tribes "North Africa" is comprised of indigenous African ancestry and large amounts of non-African ancestry, more dilution To understand this you have to look at peer reviewed scientific articles to understand the context of their percentages Interestingly the above chart also lists Arabian as 26.1 % Indus Valley, strangely the exact same % as Horn African Another big thing which confuses the issue is that in the above chart the listing is "Arabian" -not ARABIA So if we look at what Arabs are at DNA Tribes: http://www.dnatribes.com/pops-neareast.html Arab (Iraq) (103) Arab (Israel) (227) Arab (Morocco) (54) Arab (Morocco) (94) So when they list Arabian on the above chart it is not talking only of Arabia xyyman ask yourself why do they have Arabs in Morocco? If your theory was correct they would all be Africans Aplogists for Islamic conquest of North Africa argue that no military force was involved at all But if you look at history they accomplished this with Arab armies of tens of thousands. Often when large armies come into small villages the villagers realize they have no chance and they simply surrender. Some categorize such events as peaceful conversion And before the Arabs North Africa was under the control of the Byzantines, Romans who the Arabs went to war with And guess what, the capital of the Islamic empire at the time was Damacus in Syria, not Arabia "Arab" doesn't mean any muslim in these DNA Tribes reports. It is defined by J1 and other hgs This is why you can't loot at a chart about Early European Farmers and take info out of context and make a statement about Arabia [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3